Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264420›Full record

SynthesisBMJ sexual & reproductive health2022

Factors associated with female genital mutilation: a systematic review and synthesis of national, regional and community-based studies.

Zeinab El-Dirani, Leen Farouki, Christelle Akl, Ubah Ali, Chaza Akik, Stephen J McCall

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeinab El-Dirani *Center of Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-3610-3816
Leen Farouki *Center of Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Christelle AklCenter of Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ubah AliCenter of Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Chaza AkikCenter of Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Stephen J McCallCenter of Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon sm227@aub.edu.lb.ORCID 0000-0003-0078-7010
American University of Beirut · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review aimed to identify and describe the factors that influence female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C).

methodsSearches were conducted in Medline, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase and the grey literature from 2009 to March 2020 with no language restrictions, using related MESH terms and keywords. Studies were included if they were quantitative and examined factors associated with FGM/C. Two researchers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed study quality. The direction, strength and consistency of the association were evaluated for determinants, presented as a descriptive summary, and were disaggregated by age and region.

resultsOf 2230 studies identified, 54 published articles were included. The majority of studies were from the African Region (n=29) followed by the Eastern Mediterranean Region (n=18). A lower level of maternal education, family history of FGM/C, or belonging to the Muslim religion (in certain contexts) increased the likelihood of FGM/C. The majority of studies that examined higher paternal education (for girls only) and living in an urban region showed a reduced likelihood of FGM/C, while conflicting evidence remained for wealth. Several studies reported that FGM/C literacy, and low community FGM/C prevalence were associated with a reduced likelihood of FGM/C.

conclusionsThere were several characteristics that appear to be associated with FGM/C, and these will better enable the targeting of policies and interventions. Importantly, parental education may be instrumental in enabling communities and countries to meet the Sustainable Development Goals.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleEducational StatusFamilyFemaleHumansPrevalencecircumcision, femaleepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID35264420
PMCPMC9279756
OpenAlexW4220790139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.