Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264369›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Sex differences in clinical outcomes for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the USA: a retrospective observational study of administrative claims data.

Michael Butzner, Douglas Leslie, Yendelela Cuffee, Christopher S Hollenbeak, Christopher Sciamanna, Theodore P Abraham

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sex Differences in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Current cardiology reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael ButznerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA mab1468@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6015-7910
Douglas LeslieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yendelela CuffeeDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher S HollenbeakDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher SciamannaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Theodore P AbrahamHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center of Excellence, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate sex differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes for patients with diagnosed obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) in the USA.

settingRetrospective observational study of administrative claims data from MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from IBM Watson Health.

participantsOf the 28 million covered employees and family members in MarketScan, 9306 patients with oHCM were included in this analysis.

main outcome measuresoHCM-related outcomes included heart failure, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/ fibrillation, sudden cardiac death, septal myectomy, alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and heart transplant.

resultsAmong 9306 patients with oHCM, the majority were male (60.5%, p<0.001) and women were of comparable age to men (50±15 vs 49±15 years, p<0.001). Women were less likely to be prescribed beta blockers (42.7% vs 45.2%, p=0.017) and undergo an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (1.7% vs 2.6%, p=0.005). Septal reduction therapy was performed slightly more frequently in women (ASA: 0.08% vs 0.05%, p=0.600; SM: 0.35% vs 0.18%, p=0.096), although not statistically significant. Women were less likely to have atrial fibrillation (6.7% vs 9.9%, p<0.001).

conclusionWomen were less likely to be prescribed beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, anticoagulants, undergo implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and have ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Men were more likely to have atrial fibrillation. Future research using large, clinical real-world data are warranted to understand the root cause of these potential treatment disparities in women with oHCM.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicDefibrillators, ImplantableTachycardia, VentricularDeath, Sudden, CardiacFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSex CharacteristicsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Fibrillationcardiac epidemiologycardiologycardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID35264369
PMCPMC8915302
OpenAlexW4221051368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.