Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264349›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Willingness, perceived barriers and motivators in adopting mobile applications for health-related interventions among older adults: a scoping review.

Nurul Asilah Ahmad, Arimi Fitri Mat Ludin, Suzana Shahar, Shahrul Azman Mohd Noah, Noorlaili Mohd Tohit

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nurul Asilah AhmadCenter for Healthy Ageing and Wellness, National University of Malaysia, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5727-1237
Arimi Fitri Mat LudinCenter for Healthy Ageing and Wellness, National University of Malaysia, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia arimifitri@ukm.edu.my.ORCID 0000-0003-1517-2115
Suzana ShaharCenter for Healthy Ageing and Wellness, National University of Malaysia, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia.
Shahrul Azman Mohd NoahFaculty of Information, Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Noorlaili Mohd TohitDepartment of Family Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
National University of Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis scoping review aims to identify the level of willingness, the existing barriers, and motivators among older adults in using mobile applications to monitor and manage their health conditions. The secondary aim of this paper is to categorise these willingness, barriers and motivators using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

designScoping review. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Science Direct (January 2009-December 2020). STUDY SELECTION: Studies that describe older adults' perspectives with regard to their willingness, barriers or motivators towards the use of mobile applications in monitoring and managing their health condition were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Titles and abstracts were initially screened by two reviewers. Articles agreed by both reviewers were proceeded to full-text screening. One reviewer extracted the data, which were verified by a second reviewer. Findings were further classified according to the 14 TDF domains by two researchers.

resultsSix studies were included in the final scoping review. Barriers to adopting mobile applications for health-related interventions among older adults were the most common topic identified in the included studies. Barriers included being unaware of the existence of mobile health applications, lack of technological skills, lack of perceived ability and time, absence of professional involvements, and violation of trust and privacy. With regard to willingness, older adults are willing to use mobile applications if the apps incorporated features from a trusted source and have valid credentials. Motivators included continuous improvements of mobile applications' design interface and personalised features tailored to older adults' needs.

conclusionsWith the constant research for more diversified technology, the development of mobile applications to help older adults to manage and monitor health is seen as feasible, but barriers have to be addressed. The most prominent barriers linked to TDF domains were: (1) technological skills, (2) belief about consequences, and (3) memory, attention and decision process. Future interventions should use behaviour change techniques that target these three TDF domains in order to improve the ability to engage older adults with mobile technology.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineText MessagingAgedDelivery of Health CareHumansTechnologygeriatric medicineinformation technologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35264349
PMCPMC8915330
OpenAlexW4220652371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.