Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264328›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2023

Establishing a method to estimate the effect of antimyopia management options on lifetime cost of myopia.

Tim R Fricke, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Thomas Naduvilath, Serge Resnikoff, Nina Tahhan, Mingguang He, Kevin D Frick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effect of low-dose atropine eyedrops on pupil metrics: results after half a year of treatment and cessation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The prevalence and costs of optical correction for childhood myopia in Scotland.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimising non-cycloplegic screening strategies for early detection of pre-myopia and myopia in young children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  12. Access to Myopia Care in the United States-A Narrative Review.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tim R FrickeBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia t.fricke@bhvi.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8087-6835
Padmaja SankaridurgBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5537-6193
Thomas NaduvilathBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Serge ResnikoffBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nina TahhanBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mingguang HeZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kevin D FrickJohns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0178-5319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformed decisions on myopia management require an understanding of financial impact. We describe methodology for estimating lifetime myopia costs, with comparison across management options, using exemplars in Australia and China.

methodsWe demonstrate a process for modelling lifetime costs of traditional myopia management (TMM=full, single-vision correction) and active myopia management (AMM) options with clinically meaningful treatment efficacy. Evidence-based, location-specific and ethnicity-specific progression data determined the likelihood of all possible refractive outcomes. Myopia care costs were collected from published sources and key informants. Refractive and ocular health decisions were based on standard clinical protocols that responded to the speed of progression, level of myopia, and associated risks of pathology and vision impairment. We used the progressions, costs, protocols and risks to estimate and compare lifetime cost of myopia under each scenario and tested the effect of 0%, 3% and 5% annual discounting, where discounting adjusts future costs to 2020 value.

resultsLow-dose atropine, antimyopia spectacles, antimyopia multifocal soft contact lenses and orthokeratology met our AMM inclusion criteria. Lifetime cost for TMM with 3% discounting was US$7437 (CI US$4953 to US$10 740) in Australia and US$8006 (CI US$3026 to US$13 707) in China. The lowest lifetime cost options with 3% discounting were antimyopia spectacles (US$7280, CI US$5246 to US$9888) in Australia and low-dose atropine (US$4453, CI US$2136 to US$9115) in China.

conclusionsFinancial investment in AMM during childhood may be balanced or exceeded across a lifetime by reduced refractive progression, simpler lenses, and reduced risk of pathology and vision loss. Our methodology can be applied to estimate cost in comparable scenarios.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicMyopiaAtropineDisease ProgressionEyeHumansRefraction, OcularAtropineOptics and RefractionPublic health

Identifiers

PMID35264328
PMCPMC10359589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.