Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264314›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2022

Is Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion Prognostic for Clinical Outcomes in Type II Endometrial Cancer?

S Jaishankar, P M Pifer, R Bhargava, A Keller, H B Musunuru, A K Patel, P Sukumvanich, M Boisen, J L Berger, S Taylor and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S JaishankarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
P M PiferDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
R BhargavaDepartment of Pathology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A KellerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
H B MusunuruDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A K PatelDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
P SukumvanichDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
M BoisenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J L BergerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S TaylorDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
M Courtney-BrooksDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A OlawaiyeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J LesnockDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
R EdwardsDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J A VargoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S BeriwalDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Varian Medical Systems, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Electronic address: sushilberiwal@gmail.com.
Magee-Womens Hospital · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USAllegheny Health Network · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Head and Neck OncologyT32CA060397 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZEVALLOS, JOSE P. · 1994 to 2024
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA060397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSubstantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) compared with none or focal LVSI is predictive of lymph node involvement and worse clinical outcomes in endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. We aimed to quantify the incidence of substantial LVSI in type II (clear cell and serous) endometrial cancer and correlate the extent of LVSI with clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review was conducted on type II endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgical management from July 2017 to December 2019 using the three-tier LVSI scoring system. Binary logistic regression and Cox regression were used to analyse predictors of lymph node involvement or survival outcomes, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test were used to analyse differences in locoregional disease-free survival (LR-DFS), distant metastasis disease-free survival (DM-DFS) and overall survival between patients with substantial versus none/focal LVSI.

resultsIn 79 patients with type II endometrial carcinoma, no LVSI, focal LVSI and substantial LVSI was present in 48.1%, 15.2% and 36.7% of patients, respectively. Lymph nodes were involved in 0.0% with no LVSI, 20.0% with focal LVSI and 60.0% with substantial LVSI (P < 0.001). The median follow-up was 22.2 months. In patients with none/focal versus substantial LVSI, the 2-year LR-DFS and DM-DFS rates were 91.5% versus 71.4% (P = 0.01) and 90.2% versus 63.8% (P = 0.005), respectively. On univariate analysis, myometrial invasion ≥50%, tumour size ≥3.6 cm, substantial versus none/focal LVSI, lymph node involvement and omission of adjuvant radiotherapy were significant predictors for worse LR-DFS and DM-DFS (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Substantial LVSI has a high incidence in type II pathology at our institution and predicts for lymph node involvement and worse clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesClear cell endometrial carcinomaserous endometrial carcinomasubstantial lymphovascular space invasiontype II endometrial carcinomauterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID35264314
PMCPMC9296073
OpenAlexW4220741946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.