Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264255›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

Validation of the coping self-efficacy scale: Vietnamese version for adolescents.

Thach Tran, Nga La, Huong Nguyen, Ian Shochet, Nga Nguyen, Astrid Wurfl, Jayne Orr, Hau Nguyen, Ruby Stocker, Jane Fisher

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. "International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thach Tran *Global and Women's Health, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4 - 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. Thach.Tran@monash.edu.
Nga La *Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Huong NguyenHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Ian ShochetSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Nga NguyenHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Astrid WurflSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Jayne OrrSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Hau NguyenGlobal and Women's Health, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4 - 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Ruby StockerGlobal and Women's Health, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4 - 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Jane FisherGlobal and Women's Health, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4 - 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1158429Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development NHMRC.108.01-2018.02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to examine the construct validity of the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale-Vietnamese Version (CSES-V) among Vietnamese adolescents.

methodsThis study selected Grade 10 students from eight schools in Hanoi using a multiple-stage sampling method. Multiple aspects of the construct validity were examined including: factorial structure (evaluated using exploratory factor analysis); internal consistency (tested using Cronbach's alpha coefficient); measurement invariance between male and female participants and longitudinal measurement invariance (tested by employing multiple group confirmatory factor analysis) and external aspect (tested using Pearson's correlation coefficients between CSES-V and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Subscales of Depression (DASS21-D), Anxiety (DASS21-A), and Stress (DASS21-S) and a measure of mental well-being, Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)).

resultsA total of 1082 adolescents (aged 14-16 years) was included in this study. Data supported a three-factor structure (comprising 24 items) that explained 97.6% of the total variance of the CSES-V. Cronbach's alpha coefficients of all three factors were acceptable. All levels of measurement invariance between male and female participants and longitudinal measurement invariance were well-supported. The three factors of the CSES-V were positively correlated with MHC-SF and were negatively correlated with the DASS21 subscales at a low or moderate level, supporting the external aspect of the construct validity.

conclusionsCSES-V is recommended to assess coping self-efficacy among Vietnamese adolescents who are attending school.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSelf EfficacyAdolescentAsian PeopleFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsConstruct validityCoping self-efficacyStressVietnam

Identifiers

PMID35264255
PMCPMC8905823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.