Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264248›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Hypnotherapy for procedural pain, itch, and state anxiety in children with acute burns: a feasibility and acceptability study protocol.

Dali Geagea, Bronwyn Griffin, Roy Kimble, Vince Polito, Devin B Terhune, Zephanie Tyack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dali GeageaCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Centre for Children's Health Research, Level 7, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. d.geagea@uq.net.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-7809
Bronwyn GriffinCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Centre for Children's Health Research, Level 7, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Roy KimbleCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Centre for Children's Health Research, Level 7, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Vince PolitoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Devin B TerhuneDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, SE14 6NW, UK.
Zephanie TyackCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Centre for Children's Health Research, Level 7, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Children's Medical Research Institute · AUGoldsmiths University of London · GBMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurns and related procedures are painful and distressing for children, exposing them to acute and chronic sequelae that can negatively affect their physiological, psychological, and social functions. Non-pharmacological interventions such as distraction techniques are beneficial adjuncts to pharmacological agents for procedural pain, state anxiety, and itch in children with burns but have limitations (e.g. lack of research on burn-related itch, tailoring, and consensus on optimal treatment). Hypnotherapy is a non-pharmacological intervention that can be tailored for varied settings and populations with evidence of benefit for itch and superior effectiveness in comparison to other non-pharmacological interventions for children's procedural pain and state anxiety. Thus, children with burns can benefit from hypnotherapy as an adjunct to pharmacological agents. Yet, in paediatric burns, rigorous studies of effectiveness are limited and no studies have been identified that screen for hypnotic suggestibility, an important predictor of hypnotherapy outcomes. Considering potential barriers to the delivery of hypnotherapy in paediatric burns, the proposed study will examine the feasibility and acceptability of hypnotic suggestibility screening followed by hypnotherapy for procedural pain, state anxiety, and itch in children with acute burns.

methodsAn observational mixed-methods feasibility and acceptability study will be conducted over 15 weeks. Eligible children (N = 30) aged 4 to 16 years presenting to a paediatric burns outpatient centre in a metropolitan children's hospital in Australia with acute burns requiring dressing changes will be included. Eligible parents of children (N = up to 30) and clinicians who perform dressing changes (N = up to 20) will also be included. Child participants screened as having medium to high suggestibility as assessed by behavioural measures will receive hypnotherapy during dressing changes. A process evaluation will target feasibility and acceptability as primary outcomes and implementation (i.e. fidelity in delivery), reach, potential effectiveness, and adoption of evaluation procedures and intervention as secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Queensland Children's Hospital and Health Service ethics committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings. The findings will guide the design of future trials on the effectiveness of hypnotherapy and inform the development of child-centred hypnotic interventions in children with burns.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000988954.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityAnxietyChildrenHypnotherapyImplementationItchProcedural pain

Identifiers

PMID35264248
PMCPMC8905723
OpenAlexW4220873608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.