Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264222›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2022

Overestimation and underestimation of youths' health-related quality of life are associated with youth and caregiver positive screens for depression: results of a population-based study among youths with longstanding type 1 diabetes.

Anna Stahl-Pehe, Silvia Selinski, Christina Bächle, Katty Castillo, Karin Lange, Reinhard W Holl, Joachim Rosenbauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna Stahl-PeheInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Centre, Leibniz Centre for Diabetes Research, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. anna.stahl@ddz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-6023
Silvia SelinskiInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Centre, Leibniz Centre for Diabetes Research, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christina BächleInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Centre, Leibniz Centre for Diabetes Research, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Katty CastilloInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Centre, Leibniz Centre for Diabetes Research, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Karin LangeMedical Psychology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Reinhard W HollGerman Centre for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich-Neuherberg, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Joachim RosenbauerInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Centre, Leibniz Centre for Diabetes Research, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GI0802Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GI1109ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 82DZD00201Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 82DZD01402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to analyze the extent and direction of disagreement between self- and proxy-reported quality of life (QoL) and the factors associated with QoL overestimation and underestimation by caregivers compared with self-reports.

methodsThis study used data from population-based questionnaire surveys conducted in 2012-2013 and 2015-2016 with 11- to 17-year-olds with a duration of type 1 diabetes of 10 years or longer and their caregivers (n = 1058). QoL in youth was assessed via 10-item KIDSCREEN (KIDSCREEN-10) self- and proxy-reported questionnaires. The scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QoL. Depression screening was performed via the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children for youths (CES-DC screen positive: score > 15) and WHO-5 Well-being Index for parents/caregivers (WHO-5 screen positive: score ≤ 50).

resultsThe mean self- and proxy-reported normalized KIDSCREEN-10 scores were 64.2 (standard deviation [SD] 11.4) and 66.1 (11.5), respectively. More caregivers overestimated (self-reported minus proxy-reported score < - 0.5*SD self-reported score) than underestimated (self-reported minus proxy-reported score > 0.5*SD self-reported score) youths' QoL (37% versus 23%, p < 0.001). Youths who screened positive for depression (18%) were at higher risk of their QoL being overestimated and lower risk of their QoL being underestimated by caregivers than youths who screened negative for depression (RR

conclusionsCaregivers often over- or underestimated their children's QoL. Positive screens for depression among both youths and caregivers contributed to the observed differences between self- and caregiver-reported QoL.

Indexed as

AdolescentsDepression screeningEpidemiologyPsychologyQuality of lifeType 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35264222
PMCPMC8905804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.