Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264181›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2022

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on illicit drug supply, drug-related behaviour of people who use drugs and provision of drug related services in Georgia: results of a mixed methods prospective cohort study.

David Otiashvili, Tamar Mgebrishvili, Ada Beselia, Irina Vardanashvili, Kostyantyn Dumchev, Tetiana Kiriazova, Irma Kirtadze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Why do people use drugs? A neglected question.Irish journal of medical science · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David OtiashviliAddiction Research Center Alternative Georgia, 14A Nutsubidze Street, Office 2, 0177, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Tamar MgebrishviliAddiction Research Center Alternative Georgia, 14A Nutsubidze Street, Office 2, 0177, Tbilisi, Georgia. tamar@altgeorgia.ge.ORCID 0000-0002-8584-7686
Ada BeseliaAddiction Research Center Alternative Georgia, 14A Nutsubidze Street, Office 2, 0177, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Irina VardanashviliSchool of Arts and Sciences, Ilia State University, 3/5 Kakutsa Cholokashvili Ave., 0162, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Kostyantyn DumchevUkrainian Institute On Public Health Policy, 5 Biloruska Str. Office 20, 27, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine.
Tetiana KiriazovaUkrainian Institute On Public Health Policy, 5 Biloruska Str. Office 20, 27, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine.
Irma KirtadzeAddiction Research Center Alternative Georgia, 14A Nutsubidze Street, Office 2, 0177, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Funding

European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction CT.20.EU4MD.0028.1.0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines the effects of COVID-19 related restrictions on the supply of illicit drugs, drug-use behaviour among people who use drugs (PWUD) regularly (at least weekly), and drug-related service provision in Tbilisi, Georgia. METHODOLOGY: In this mixed methods study, a cohort of 50 Georgian PWUD recruited through a snow-ball sampling participated in a bi-weekly online survey in April-September, 2020. They also took part in the qualitative telephone interviews at 12- and 24-week follow-up time points. In addition, four key informants (field experts) were interviewed monthly to assess their perceptions of changes in the illicit drug market and drug service delivery.

resultsMean age in the sample was 36 (range 18-60); 39 (78%) were males. Perceived availability of drugs was reduced during the lockdown, and many PWUD switched to alternative substances when preferred drugs were not available. On average, participants used significantly fewer substances over the course of the study, from 3.5 substances in the preceding 14 days to 2.1 (aOR 0.92; 95% CI 0.90-0.94). Consumption of cannabis products declined significantly (aOR 0.89; 95% CI 0.84-0.95), likewise alcohol (aOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.88-1.0), diverted medicinal methadone (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.8-0.9) and diverted medicinal buprenorphine (aOR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.99). PWUD cited fewer contacts with drug dealers, the lack of transportation, and the lack of conventional recreational environment as the main reasons for these changes. When access to sterile injection equipment was limited, PWUD exercised risk-containing injection behaviours, such as buying drugs in pre-filled syringes (aOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.96). Harm reduction and treatment programs managed to adopt flexible strategies to recover services that were affected during the initial stage of the pandemic.

conclusionsCOVID-19-related restrictive measures mediated specific changes in supply models and drug-use behaviours. While adjusting to the new environment, many PWUD would engage in activities that put them under increased risk of overdose and blood-borne infections. Harm reduction and treatment services need to develop and implement protocols for ensuring uninterrupted service delivery during lockdowns, in anticipation of the similar epidemics or other emergency situations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Illicit DrugsAdolescentAdultCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleGeorgia (Republic)HumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Substance-Related DisordersYoung AdultIllicit DrugsCOVID-19Drug-use behaviourGeorgiaIllicit drug supply

Identifiers

PMID35264181
PMCPMC8906357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.