Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264176›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Asynchronous online lecture may not be an effective method in teaching cardiovascular physiology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Weerapat Kositanurit, Sarocha Vivatvakin, Kasiphak Kaikaew, Pachara Varachotisate, Chuti Burana, Maneerat Chayanupatkul, Sekh Thanprasertsuk, Danai Wangsaturaka, Onanong Kulaputana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Implementing a Social Presence-Based Teaching Strategy in Online Lecture Learning.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weerapat KositanuritDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sarocha VivatvakinDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kasiphak KaikaewDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Pachara VarachotisateDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chuti BuranaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Maneerat ChayanupatkulDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sekh ThanprasertsukDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Danai WangsaturakaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Onanong KulaputanaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. onanong.k@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsynchronous online lecture has become a common teaching method in medical education, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the effectiveness and students' attitudes towards this method under this special circumstance have not been exclusively studied. Hence, we aimed to evaluate these aspects of cardiovascular physiology teaching in an undergraduate medical curriculum.

methodsWe analysed and compared the academic achievement and attitudes of 613 medical students on cardiovascular physiology between pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 years in which different teaching methods were implemented. In addition, we also explored the importance of teaching methods and teachers by subgroup analysis to evaluate whether they influenced the academic achievement and attitudes of students.

resultsOverall students' academic achievement was significantly higher when lectures were taught by the traditional method than by the asynchronous online method. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed that teachers were also a factor influencing students' academic achievement. Although most students had positive attitudes towards asynchronous online lectures, overall satisfaction was slightly higher when all lectures were taught by the traditional method than by the asynchronous online method.

conclusionsAsynchronous online lectures might not be an effective teaching method especially during the abrupt change in education. Under the 'new normal' medical education, not only teaching methods but also teachers are the essential keys to the success in academic achievement and attitudes of undergraduate medical students.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2TeachingAcademic performanceAsynchronous online lectureAttitudeTraditional lectureUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID35264176
PMCPMC8905559
OpenAlexW4220664591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.