Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264130›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

A new tool to evaluate burnout: the Italian version of the BAT for Italian healthcare workers.

Ivan Borrelli, Paolo Emilio Santoro, Caterina Fiorilli, Giacomo Angelini, Ilaria Buonomo, Paula Benevene, Luciano Romano, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Carlotta Amantea, Umberto Moscato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Validity Evidence for the Secondary Symptoms of the Burnout Assessment Tool: A Brazilian Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ivan BorrelliDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. Ivan.Borrelli@unicatt.it.
Paolo Emilio SantoroDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Caterina FiorilliDepartment of Human Sciences, University of LUMSA, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo AngeliniDepartment of Human Sciences, University of LUMSA, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria BuonomoDepartment of Human Sciences, University of LUMSA, Rome, Italy.
Paula BeneveneDepartment of Human Sciences, University of LUMSA, Rome, Italy.
Luciano RomanoDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Rosaria GualanoDepartment of Public Health, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Carlotta AmanteaDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Umberto MoscatoDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) represents one of the highest-risk population to develop burnout symptoms. Recently, a new tool has been designed to measure several dimensions that capture an exhaustive expression of burnout symptoms by six dimensions (i.e., exhaustion; mental distance; cognitive impairment; emotional impairment; psychological distress; psychosomatic complaints).

methodsThe current study aims to adapt the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) to an Italian Healthcare workers' sample confirming the original second-order factorial structure. Furthermore, we expected to find good indexes of reliability and validity tests. Participants were 697 Italian Health Care Workers (Female = 68.44%; mean age = 36.47; SD = 11.20). Data were collected by self-report questionnaires submitted by the snowball method.

resultsFindings show a good fit of the BAT's structure, confirming the hypothesized second-order factorial model. Furthermore, good reliability has been established with the study's measures.

conclusionsThe BAT for HCWs is eligible as a new tool to evaluate burnout in the at-risk HCWs as a multi-facet constellation of symptoms.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalBurnout, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBurnoutHealthcare workersOccupationalPsychological distressPsychosomaticQuestionnaireToolValidation

Identifiers

PMID35264130
PMCPMC8906913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.