Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35263506›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2022

Fracture rate and time to fracture in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma receiving finely fractionated compared to coarsely fractionated radiation therapy: A single institution study.

Carissa J Norquest, Charles A Maitz, Deborah A Keys, Melanie Moore, Jeffrey N Bryan, Tara J Ehling, Jimmy C Lattimer, Brian K Flesner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk Factors for Pathologic Fracture in Dogs With Confirmed or Suspected Appendicular Osteosarcoma Treated With Low- or Standard-Dose-Rate Palliative External Beam Radiation Therapy.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carissa J NorquestVeterinary Health Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Charles A MaitzVeterinary Health Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Deborah A KeysKaleidoscope Statistics LLC, Athens, Georgia.
Melanie MooreVeterinary Health Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Jeffrey N BryanVeterinary Health Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Tara J EhlingVeterinary Health Center at Wentzville, University of Missouri, Wentzville, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-7870
Jimmy C LattimerVeterinary Health Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Brian K FlesnerVeterinary Health Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-2459-7054
University of Missouri Health System · USLeidos (United States) · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation therapy (RT) is used for local pain alleviation in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma (OS), especially among dogs that are poor surgical candidates for amputation. However, many historical reports of fractionated protocols lack time to fracture and fracture rates.

objectivesThe primary objectives of this retrospective study were to determine fracture rate and time to fracture of dogs receiving RT (coarse or fine fractionated) for appendicular OS. Secondary objectives were to evaluate tolerability and disease outcome measures.

methodsFifty-one dogs that received RT as part of treatment for appendicular OS were available for evaluation. Forty-five received coarse fractionation (C-RT, 8 or 6 Gy per fraction protocols [C-RT8 or C-RT6]) while the remaining six received fine fractionation (F-RT).

resultsThe overall pathologic fracture rate was 37%. Pathologic fracture rate was significantly higher for dogs that received F-RT (5/6, 83%) compared to dogs that received C-RT (12/40, 30%, p = 0.021). In the 17 dogs that fractured, the overall median time to fracture was 57 days. For all dogs, the median progression free interval (PFI) and median overall survival time (OST) were 90 and 140 days, respectively. In a very small cohort of dogs (n = 7) treated with zoledronate and RT, fracture rate was 0% and extended survival times were noted.

conclusionsIn conclusion, C-RT is recommended over F-RT due to lower risk of pathologic fracture and similar PFI. Prospective evaluation of combined C-RT and zoledronate, especially for dogs with poor surgical candidacy, is warranted for the treatment of canine appendicular osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDog DiseasesFractures, SpontaneousOsteosarcomaAnimalsDogsHumansRetrospective StudiesZoledronic AcidZoledronic Acidcanineosteosarcomapathologic fractureradiation therapyzoledronate

Identifiers

PMID35263506
PMCPMC9122396
OpenAlexW4220674085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.