Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35263461›Full record

ArticleMedical education2022

How does multisource feedback influence residency training? A qualitative case study.

Eva K Hennel, Andrea Trachsel, Ulrike Subotic, Andrea C Lörwald, Sigrid Harendza, Sören Huwendiek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Learning How to Listen: A Collaborative Approach to Improve the Residency Learning Environment.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva K HennelDepartment for Assessment and Evaluation (AAE), Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7625-5785
Andrea TrachselDepartment for Assessment and Evaluation (AAE), Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ulrike SuboticUniversity Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1383-1036
Andrea C LörwaldDepartment for Assessment and Evaluation (AAE), Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-8101
Sigrid HarendzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7920-8431
Sören HuwendiekDepartment for Assessment and Evaluation (AAE), Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-9633
University of Bern · CHUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Children’s Hospital Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultisource feedback (MSF), also called 360-degree assessment, is one form of assessment used in postgraduate training. However, there is an ongoing discussion on its value, because the factors that influence the impact of MSF and the main impact of MSF are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated both the influencing factors and the impact of MSF on residency training.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative case study within the boundaries of the residency training for paediatricians and paediatric surgeons at a University Hospital. We collected data from seven focus group interviews with stakeholders of MSF (residents, raters and supervisors). By performing a reflexive thematic analysis, we extracted the influencing factors and the impact of MSF.

resultsWe found seven influencing factors: MSF is facilitated by the announcement of a clear goal of MSF, the training of raters on the MSF instrument, a longitudinal approach of observation, timing not too early and not too late during the rotation, narrative comments as part of the ratings, the residents' self-assessment and a supervisor from the same department. We found three themes on the impact of MSF: MSF supports the professional development of residents, enhances interprofessional teamwork and increases the raters' commitment to the training of residents.

conclusionThis study illuminates the influencing factors and impact of MSF on residency training. We offer novel recommendations on the continuity of observation, the timing during rotations and the role of the supervisor. Moreover, by discussing our results through the lens of identity formation theory, this work advances our conceptual understanding of MSF. We propose identity formation theory as a framework for future research on MSF to leverage the potential of MSF in residency training.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyChildClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateFeedbackHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID35263461
PMCPMC9314722
OpenAlexW4220806903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.