Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35263375›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Attitude of health professionals towards COVID-19 vaccination and associated factors among health professionals, Western Ethiopia: A cross-sectional survey.

Tadesse Tolossa, Bizuneh Wakuma, Ebisa Turi, Diriba Mulisa, Diriba Ayala, Getahun Fetensa, Belayneh Mengist, Gebeyehu Abera, Emiru Merdassa Atomssa, Dejene Seyoum and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tadesse TolossaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-7936-9024
Bizuneh WakumaDepartment of Nursing, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Ebisa TuriDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Diriba MulisaDepartment of Nursing, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Diriba AyalaDepartment of Midwifery, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Getahun FetensaDepartment of Nursing, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Belayneh MengistDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Gebeyehu AberaNekemte Health Center, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Emiru Merdassa AtomssaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Dejene SeyoumDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Tesfaye ShibiruSchool of Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekmete, Ethiopia.
Ayantu GetahunDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Science, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEven though people of the world were eagerly waiting for the hope of vaccine development, vaccine hesitancy is becoming the top concern in both developed and developing countries. However, there is no adequate evidence regarding the attitude and perception of health professionals towards the COVID 19 vaccine in resource-limited settings like Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess health professionals' attitudes and perceptions towards COVID 19 vaccine in Western Ethiopia.

methodsAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among health care workers found in Nekemte town from April 14-21, 2021. A total of 439 health professionals present on duty during the study period was included in the study. The data were collected by using self-administered questionnaire. Epidata version 3.2 was used for data entry, and STATA version 14 was used for data analysis. The binary logistic regression model was employed to determine factors associated with the attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals was computed and statistical significance was declared at a 5% level (p-value < 0.05).

resultA total of 431 health professionals participated in the study yielding a response rate of 98.1%. The results indicated that 51.28% (95%CI: 45.12%, 57.34%) of health professionals had a favorable attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. Having good knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine (AOR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.22, 0.64, P-value <0.001) was negatively associated with unfavorable attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine, whereas age less than 30 years (AOR = 2.14, 95%CI:1.25,3.67, P-value <0.001), working in a private clinic (AOR = 7.77, 95% CI: 2.19, 27.58, P-value <0.001) and health center (AOR = 2.45, 95%CI: 1.01, 5.92, P-value = 0.045) were positively associated with unfavorable attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: In general, the attitude and perception of health care professionals toward the COVID-19 vaccine in the study area were unsatisfactory. Knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine, age of health care workers, and place of work are the factors which affects attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine. Thus, we recommend the media outlets and concerned bodies to work to develop trust among the public by disseminating accurate and consistent information about the vaccine.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdultCommunity Health CentersCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansKnowledgeMaleMultivariate AnalysisPrivate FacilitiesSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35263375
PMCPMC8906598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.