Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35263346›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Outcomes of a controlled trial with visiting therapy dog teams on pain in adults in an emergency department.

Ben Carey, Colleen Anne Dell, James Stempien, Susan Tupper, Betty Rohr, Eloise Carr, Maria Cruz, Sharon Acoose, Peter Butt, Lindsey Broberg and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04727749 (A Study of the Pawsitive Impacts of Therapy Dog Visits With Adult Emergency Department Pain Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04727749 nacompletednot on this map

A Study of the Pawsitive Impacts of Therapy Dog Visits With Adult Emergency Department Pain Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SaskatchewanRan2019 to 2019Enrolled211ConditionsPain, Pain, Acute, Pain, Chronic, Pain, IntractableArmsTherapy Dog Team Visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of pets and animal assisted therapy in suicide prevention.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ben CareyDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Colleen Anne DellDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-1606
James StempienCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Susan TupperQuality, Safety & Standards, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Betty RohrDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Eloise CarrFaculty of Nursing University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Maria CruzDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Sharon AcooseSchool of Indigenous Social Work, First Nations University of Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Peter ButtCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Lindsey BrobergCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Lisa CollardEmergency Services, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Logan Fele-SlaferekCollege of Arts & Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Cathie FornsslerSaskatchewan Centre for Patient Oriented Research, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Donna GoodridgeCollege of Nursing & Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Janet GundersonSaskatchewan Centre for Patient Oriented Research, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Holly McKenzieDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Joe RubinVeterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Jason ShandClinical Analyst, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Jane SmithSt. John Ambulance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Jason TraskEmergency Services, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Kerry UkrainetzSaskatchewan Centre for Patient Oriented Research, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Simona MeierClinical Research Professional Clinical Trial Support Unit, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CASaskatchewan Health Authority · CAFirst Nations University of Canada · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPain is a primary reason individuals attend an Emergency Department (ED), and its management is a concern.

objectivesChange in symptoms and physiologic variables at 3 time points pre-post a ten-minute St. John Ambulance therapy dog team visit compared to no visit in ED patients who experienced pain. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsUsing a controlled clinical trial design, pain, anxiety, depression and well-being were measured with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scales before, immediately after, and 20 minutes post- therapy dog team visit with Royal University Hospital ED patients participating in the study (n = 97). Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at the time points. Control data was gathered twice (30 minutes apart) for comparison (n = 101). There were no group differences in age, gender or ethnicity among the control and intervention groups (respectively mean age 59.5/57.2, ethnicity 77.2% Caucasian/87.6%, female 43.6% /39.2%, male 56.4%/60.8%,).

intervention10 minute therapy dog team visit in addition to usual care.

main outcome measuresChange in reported pain from pre and post therapy dog team visit and comparison with a control group.

resultsA two-way ANOVA was conducted to compare group effects. Significant pre- post-intervention differences were noted in pain for the intervention (mean changeint. = -0.9, SD = 2.05, p = .004, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.42, 1.32], ηp2 = 04) but not the control group. Anxiety (mean changeint. = -1.13, SD = 2.80, p = .005, 95% CI = [0.56, 1.64], ηp2 = .04), depression (mean changeint. = -0.72, SD = 1.71, p = .002, 95% CI = [0.39, 1.11], ηp2 = .047), and well-being ratings (mean changeint. = -0.87, SD = 1.84, p < .001, 95% CI = [0.49, 1.25], ηp2 = .07) similarly improved for the intervention group only. There were no pre-post intervention differences in blood pressure or heart rate for either group. Strong responders to the intervention (i.e. >50% reduction) were observed for pain (43%), anxiety (48%), depression (46%), and well-being (41%).

conclusionsClinically significant changes in pain as well as significant changes in anxiety, depression and well-being were observed in the therapy dog intervention compared to control. The findings of this novel study contribute important knowledge towards the potential value of ED therapy dogs to affect patients' experience of pain, and related measures of anxiety, depression and well-being.

trial registrationThis controlled clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT04727749.

Indexed as

PainTherapy AnimalsAnimalsDogsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID35263346
PMCPMC9064456
OpenAlexW4220984387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.