Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35263326›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Nonfatal opioid overdoses before and after Covid-19: Regional variation in rates of change.

Albert J Burgess-Hull, Kirsten E Smith, Leigh V Panlilio, Destiny Schriefer, Kenzie L Preston, Aliese Alter, Christopher Yeager, Timothy Chizmar, Ted Delbridge, Kenan Zamore and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Drug Market's Impact on the Overdose Risk Environment for Women Who Use Drugs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Albert J Burgess-HullNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2494-5538
Kirsten E SmithNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9278-1830
Leigh V PanlilioNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Destiny SchrieferNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3583-1659
Kenzie L PrestonNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Aliese AlterOffice of National Drug Control Policy, High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Christopher YeagerOffice of National Drug Control Policy, High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Timothy ChizmarMaryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS), Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0067-880X
Ted DelbridgeMaryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS), Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1783-4821
Kenan ZamoreDistrict of Columbia Department of Health, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Jeff BeesonOffice of National Drug Control Policy, High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, Washington, DC, United States of America.
David H EpsteinNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USMaryland Medical Research Institute · USDistrict of Columbia Department of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic and its accompanying public-health orders (PHOs) have led to (potentially countervailing) changes in various risk factors for overdose. To assess whether the net effects of these factors varied geographically, we examined regional variation in the impact of the PHOs on counts of nonfatal overdoses, which have received less attention than fatal overdoses, despite their public health significance.

methodsData were collected from the Overdose Detection Mapping Application Program (ODMAP), which recorded suspected overdoses between July 1, 2018 and October 25, 2020. We used segmented regression models to assess the impact of PHOs on nonfatal-overdose trends in Washington DC and the five geographical regions of Maryland, using a historical control time series to adjust for normative changes in overdoses that occurred around mid-March (when the PHOs were issued).

resultsThe mean level change in nonfatal opioid overdoses immediately after mid-March was not reliably different in the Covid-19 year versus the preceding control time series for any region. However, the rate of increase in nonfatal overdose was steeper after mid-March in the Covid-19 year versus the preceding year for Maryland as a whole (B = 2.36; 95% CI, 0.65 to 4.06; p = .007) and for certain subregions. No differences were observed for Washington DC.

conclusionsThe pandemic and its accompanying PHOs were associated with steeper increases in nonfatal opioid overdoses in most but not all of the regions we assessed, with a net effect that was deleterious for the Maryland region as a whole.

Indexed as

COVID-19District of ColumbiaHumansMarylandNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate OverdosePandemicsPublic HealthRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID35263326
PMCPMC8906602
OpenAlexW4220722964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.