Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35263198›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53

To Utility and Beyond! Specifying and Advancing the Utility of Measurement-Based Care for Youth.

Bryce D McLeod, Amanda Jensen-Doss, Aaron R Lyon, Susan Douglas, Rinad S Beidas

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evidence Base Update on the Assessment of Irritability, Anger, and Aggression in Youth.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bryce D McLeodDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-0492
Amanda Jensen-DossDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-7463
Aaron R LyonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-3657-5060
Susan DouglasDepartment of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University.ORCID 0000-0002-5239-4828
Rinad S BeidasDepartments of Psychiatry, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, & Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-6071

Funding

Improving Measurement-Based Care in Youth Mental Health: A Comparison of Unidimensional and Multidimensional ApproachesR34MH118316 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI DOUGLAS, SUSAN RAE, JENSEN-DOSS, AMANDA · 2019 to 2021
$691k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH118316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health organizations that serve youth are under pressure to adopt measurement-based care (MBC), defined as the continuous collection of client-report data used to support clinical decision-making as part of standard care. However, few frameworks exist to help leadership ascertain how to select an MBC approach for a clinical setting. This paper seeks to define how an MBC approach can display clinical utility to provide such a framework. Broadly, we define clinical utility as evidence that an MBC approach assists stakeholders in fulfilling clinical goals related to care quality (i.e., improve client-clinician alliance and clinical outcomes) at the client (i.e., youth and caregiver), clinician, supervisor, and administrator levels. More specifically, our definition of clinical utility is divided into two categories relevant to the usability and usefulness of an MBC approach for a specific setting: (a) implementability (i.e., evidence indicating ease of use in a clinical setting) and (b) usefulness in aiding clinical activities (i.e., evidence indicating the potential to improve communication and make clinical activities related to care quality easier or more effective). These categories provide valuable information about how easy an MBC approach is to use and the potential benefits that the MBC data will confer. To detail how we arrived at this definition, we review prior definitions of clinical utility, discuss how previous definitions inform our definition of clinical utility for MBC, and provide examples of how the concept of clinical utility can be applied to MBC. We finish with a discussion of future research directions.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesAdolescentCommunicationHumans

Identifiers

PMID35263198
PMCPMC9246828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.