Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262948›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2022

Using social cognition models to understand why people, such as perfectionists, struggle to respond with self-compassion.

Marios Biskas, Fuschia M Sirois, Thomas L Webb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marios BiskasDepartment of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-9839
Fuschia M SiroisDepartment of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-277X
Thomas L WebbDepartment of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-0068
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/S005692/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responding with self-compassion to lapses in goal pursuit helps people to achieve their goals, yet evidence suggests that some people struggle to respond with self-compassion. The current research proposes that social cognition models such the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Prototype Willingness Model could explain why some people, such as those high in perfectionistic concerns, struggle to respond with self-compassion. We therefore conducted a pre-registered prospective study that measured participants' beliefs about self-compassion, difficulties enacting self-compassionate responding, perfectionistic concerns, and then tested their ability to be self-compassionate in response to a recalled and future lapse. The results showed that participants were less likely to respond with self-compassion to lapses if they held negative beliefs about self-compassion and experienced difficulties enacting self-compassion. Participants high in perfectionistic concerns were more likely to have negative beliefs about self-compassion and experience difficulties enacting self-compassion. Together, these findings provide evidence that social cognition models can be used to understand self-compassionate responding and identify why some people struggle to respond with self-compassion to goal lapses.

Indexed as

Self-CompassionSocial CognitionEmpathyHumansMotivationProspective Studiesperfectionismprototype willingness modelself-compassionself-regulationtheory of planned behaviour

Identifiers

PMID35262948
PMCPMC9790291
OpenAlexW4220989237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.