SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2022
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Issue.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Performance Characteristics and Technical Outcomes of Single-use Versus Reusable Gastroscopes Evaluated in the Operating Room in Acute, Subacute and Elective Patients
Performance Characteristics and Technical Outcomes of Single-use Gastroscopes Used Bedside Versus Reusable Gastroscopes Used in the Endoscopy Unit Evaluated in Subacute Patients
Endoscopists' Perspectives on the Use of Single-Use Gastroscopes in Elective and Subacute Patients in the Endoscopy Unit
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and Clinical Performance of Single-Use Versus Reusable Gastrointestinal Endoscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Pooled it
- Indications and endoscopic findings of upper gastrointestinal diseases in Africa: A systematic review & meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- [A systematic analysis of nosocomial outbreaks of nosocomial infections after gastrointestinal endoscopy].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2023Pooled it
- Microbiology and antimicrobial resistance in biliary tract infections including acute and post-ERCP cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of Saudi medicinePooled it
- Effect of anesthetic nasal mask on hypoxemia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy with deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Gastrointestinal endoscopic image style transfer using EndoStyle to improve artificial intelligence prediction models.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Incidence of Cholangitis in Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Risks of GI endoscopy in cancer patients with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Single pediatric center experience with single-use duodenoscopes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven gastrointestinal functional assessment: multimodal imaging, digital biomarkers, and real-time monitoring.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- A Non-Endoscopic Dynamic Nomogram for Atrophic Gastritis Risk Stratification Based on Serum Indicators and Clinical Factors.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Closing infection pathways: Multidisciplinary disinfection measures reshape gastrointestinal surgical outcomes.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation and application of an innovative portable field endoscope: addressing battlefield and biosafety concerns.Military Medical Research · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Digestive Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Bacterial Pathogens, Host Susceptibility, and the Impact of Viral Hepatitis.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Article
- Tolerance ofBiofilm · 2024Article
- Investigations and referral for suspected gastric cancer by primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Southeastern China.BMJ open · 2024Article
- UV-C side-emitting optical fiber-based disinfection: a promising approach for infection control in tight channels.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Role of single-use gastroscopes in advanced endoscopy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Uncovering the spread of drug-resistant bacteria through next-generation sequencing based surveillance: transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales by a contaminated duodenoscope.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 17.7 million gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures are performed annually, contributing to 68% of all endoscopic procedures in the United States. Usually, endoscopic procedures are low risk, but adverse events may occur, including cardiopulmonary complications, bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and infection. Infections after the GI endoscopies most commonly result from the patient's endogenous gut flora. Although many studies have reported infection after GI endoscopic procedures, a true estimate of the incidence rate of post-endoscopy infection is lacking. In addition, the infection profile and causative organisms have evolved over time. In recent times, multi-drug-resistant microorganisms have emerged as a cause of outbreaks of endoscope-associated infections (EAI). In addition, lapses in endoscope reprocessing have been reported, with some but not all outbreaks in recent times. This systematic review summarizes the demographical, clinical, and management data of EAI events reported in the literature. A total of 117 articles were included in the systematic review, with the majority reported from North America and Western Europe. The composite infection rate was calculated to be 0.2% following GI endoscopic procedures, 0.8% following ERCP, 0.123% following non-ERCP upper GI endoscopic procedures, and 0.073% following lower GI endoscopic procedures. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common culprit organism, followed by other Enterobacteriaceae groups of organisms and Gram-positive cocci. We have also elaborated different prevention methods such as antimicrobial prophylaxis, adequate sterilization methods for reprocessing endoscopes, periodic surveillance, and current evidence supporting their utilization. Finally, we discuss disposable endoscopes, which could be an alternative to reprocessing to minimize the chances of EAIs with their effects on the environmental and financial situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.