Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262897›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

A practical guide for studying human behavior in the lab.

Joao Barbosa, Heike Stein, Sam Zorowitz, Yael Niv, Christopher Summerfield, Salvador Soto-Faraco, Alexandre Hyafil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Improving the Reliability of Cognitive Task Measures: A Narrative Review.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joao Barbosa *Brain Circuits & Behavior lab, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. palerma@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1907-3010
Heike Stein *Brain Circuits & Behavior lab, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Sam ZorowitzPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
Yael NivPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
Christopher SummerfieldDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Salvador Soto-FaracoMultisensory Research Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain, and Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
Alexandre HyafilCentre de Recerca Matemàtica, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2017 SGR 1545European Union's Horizon 2020 713673Fundação Bial 356/18La Caixa Banking Foundation LCF/BQ/IN17/11620008Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-108531GB-I00 AEI/FEDERSpanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness RYC-2017-23231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few decades, the field of neuroscience has witnessed major technological advances that have allowed researchers to measure and control neural activity with great detail. Yet, behavioral experiments in humans remain an essential approach to investigate the mysteries of the mind. Their relatively modest technological and economic requisites make behavioral research an attractive and accessible experimental avenue for neuroscientists with very diverse backgrounds. However, like any experimental enterprise, it has its own inherent challenges that may pose practical hurdles, especially to less experienced behavioral researchers. Here, we aim at providing a practical guide for a steady walk through the workflow of a typical behavioral experiment with human subjects. This primer concerns the design of an experimental protocol, research ethics, and subject care, as well as best practices for data collection, analysis, and sharing. The goal is to provide clear instructions for both beginners and experienced researchers from diverse backgrounds in planning behavioral experiments.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchResearch PersonnelData CollectionHumans10 rulesGood practicesHuman behavioral experimentsOpen scienceStudy design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.