SynthesisUpdates in surgery2022
Prophylactic endoluminal vacuum therapy after major gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Leaks.Visceral medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Improved Clinical Outcomes in Anastomotic Leak Management Using Preemptive Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy After Esophagectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic vacuum therapy for gastrointestinal transmural defects: clinical outcomes and treatment implications: a retrospective study from Korea.Ewha medical journal · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Anastomotic Leakage After Distal Gastrectomy in a Renal Transplant Patient: A Case Study.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Validation of mortality risk scores after esophagectomy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic negative-pressure treatment : From management of complications to pre-emptive active reflux drainage in abdomino-thoracic esophageal resection-A new safety concept for esophageal surgery.Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Endoscopic vacuum therapy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024Article
- The impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection, a retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Endoscopic vacuum therapy (eVAC) combined with continuous perianastomotic irrigation for prevention of anastomotic leak after surgical ampullectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Endoscopic vacuum therapy: pitfalls, tips and tricks, insights, and perspectives.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Review
- [Endoscopic negative pressure treatment : From management of complications to pre-emptive active reflux drainage in abdominothoracic esophageal resection-A new safety concept for esophageal surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy: When and How to Use It?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, endoluminal vacuum therapy (eVAC) has emerged as an effective treatment for anastomotic leak (AL); however, little is known regarding its prophylactic use. In this systematic review we evaluated overall outcomes in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery and treated with prophylactic eVAC. A systematic review of English articles on four electronic databases was performed according to the PRISMA statement up until January 2022. References of selected articles were manually screened to identify relevant missing papers. Primary endpoints were AL and mortality rates estimates. Secondary endpoints included analysis of eVAC-associated morbidity, treatment duration, long-term complications, and general indications for the eVAC management in the perioperative period. A total of 11 studies (5 case reports, 5 retrospective case series and a retrospective, case-control study) were included in the analysis. AL ranged from 0 to 25%. No major eVAC-associated complications were observed, except for sponge dislocation or obstruction. Overall mortality ranged between 0 and 12.5%; however, these fatalities were neither related to the use of eVAC, nor to AL-associated complications. The most frequent long-term complication was anastomotic stenosis responsive to endoscopic dilatation in most cases. The operating negative pressure ranged from -25 to -125 mmHg among different papers. In all studies but two, prophylactic eVAC was applied to anastomoses at high risk of dehiscence based on the subjective evaluation of the leading surgeon. In conclusion, prophylactic eVAC is safe and it could lead to potential benefit for prevention of AL, especially in high-risk anastomoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.