Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262842›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2022

Automatic detection and classification of knee osteoarthritis using deep learning approach.

S Sheik Abdullah, M Pallikonda Rajasekaran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolving Strategies for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review of Integrated Rehabilitation, Pharmacologic, and Joint-Preserving Interventions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S Sheik AbdullahDepartment of Electronics and Communication, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Srivilliputhur, India.
M Pallikonda RajasekaranDepartment of Electronics and Communication, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Srivilliputhur, India. mpraja80@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe developed a tool for locating and grading knee osteoarthritis (OA) from digital X-ray images and illustrate the possibility of deep learning techniques to predict knee OA as per the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system. The purpose of the project is to see how effectively an artificial intelligence (AI)-based deep learning approach can locate and diagnose the severity of knee OA in digital X-ray images.

methodsSelection criteria: Patients above 50 years old with OA symptoms (knee joint pain, stiffness, crepitus, and functional limitations) were included in the study. Medical experts excluded patients with post-surgical evaluation, trauma, and infection from the study. We used 3172 Anterior-posterior view knee joint digital X-ray images. We have trained the Faster RCNN architecture to locate the knee joint space width (JSW) region in digital X-ray images and we incorporate ResNet-50 with transfer learning to extract the features. We have used another pre-trained network (AlexNet with transfer learning) for the classification of knee OA severity. We trained the region proposal network (RPN) using manual extract knee area as the ground truth image and the medical experts graded the knee joint digital X-ray images based on the Kellgren-Lawrence score. An X-ray image is an input for the final model, and the output is a Kellgren-Lawrence grading value.

resultsThe proposed model identified the minimal knee JSW area with a maximum accuracy of 98.516%, and the overall knee OA severity classification accuracy was 98.90%.

conclusionsToday numerous diagnostic methods are available, but tools are not transparent and automated analysis of OA remains a problem. The performance of the proposed model increases while fine-tuning the network and it is higher than the existing works. We will extend this work to grade OA in MRI data in the future.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOsteoarthritis, KneeArtificial IntelligenceHumansKnee JointMiddle AgedPainAlexNetDigital X-ray imagesFaster R-CNNJSWOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.