Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262841›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

Prediction of Short-Term Breast Cancer Risk with Fusion of CC- and MLO-Based Risk Models in Four-View Mammograms.

Yane Li, Wei Yuan, Ming Fan, Bin Zheng, Lihua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yane LiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China.
Wei YuanInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China.
Ming FanInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China.
Bin ZhengSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. BinZheng_1@ou.edu.
Lihua LiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China. lilh@hdu.edu.cn.

Funding

Increasing Cancer Detection Yield Using Breast MRI Screening ModalityR01CA197150 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, ALAN B., LIU, HONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
National Basic Research Program (973 program) of China 2013CB329502NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197150the grant from Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China LZ15F01001the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA R01CA197150the National Key R&D Program 2017YFC0109402the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61401131the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61731008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study performed and assessed a novel program to improve the accuracy of short-term breast cancer risk prediction by using information from craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral-oblique (MLO) views of two breasts. An age-matched dataset of 556 patients with at least two sequential full-field digital mammography examinations was applied. In the second examination, 278 cases were diagnosed and pathologically verified as cancer, and 278 were negative, while all cases in the first examination were negative (not recalled). Two generalized linear-model-based risk prediction models were established with global- and local-based bilateral asymmetry features for CC and MLO views first. Then, a new fusion risk model was developed by fusing prediction results of the CC- and MLO-based risk models with an adaptive alpha-integration-based fusion method. The AUC of the fusion risk model was 0.72 ± 0.02, which was significantly higher than the AUC of CC- or MLO-based risk model (P < 0.05). The maximum odds ratio for CC- and MLO-based risk models were 8.09 and 5.25, respectively, and increased to 11.99 for the fusion risk model. For subgroups of patients aged 37-49 years, 50-65 years, and 66-87 years, the AUCs of 0.73, 0.71, and 0.75 for the fusion risk model were higher than AUC for CC- and MLO-based risk models. For the BIRADS 2 and 3 subgroups, the AUC values were 0.72 and 0.71 respectively for the fusion risk model which were higher than the AUC for the CC- and MLO-based risk models. This study demonstrated that the fusion risk model we established could effectively derive and integrate supplementary and useful information extracted from both CC and MLO view images and adaptively fuse them to increase the predictive power of the short-term breast cancer risk assessment model.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsArea Under CurveBreastFemaleHumansMammographyRisk AssessmentBilateral asymmetryComputer-aided detectionFour-view mammographyFusion risk modelShort-term breast cancer risk

Identifiers

PMID35262841
PMCPMC9485387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.