Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262824›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2022

Adolescent Mental Health in Relation to Anti-Racism Critical Action.

Amy E Heberle, Anna C Wagner, Noah Hoch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Discrimination, critical consciousness, and mental health in American youth of color.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy E HeberleClark University, 950 Main St., Worcester, MA, 01610, USA. aheberle@clarku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-828X
Anna C WagnerClark University, 950 Main St., Worcester, MA, 01610, USA.
Noah HochClark University, 950 Main St., Worcester, MA, 01610, USA.
Clark University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relation between critical action and mental health in youth is unclear, despite theory suggesting that engagement in critical action may support adaptive mental health functioning for youth experiencing oppressive systems. The current study contributed to the literature in this understudied area by analyzing the relations between youth critical anti-racism action and their depressive symptoms and psychological well-being, as well as testing two potential moderators of these relations: parent critical motivation and community anti-racism. The study sample consisted of 430 13-to-17-year-old adolescents (M age = 15.3 years, 54% girls, 48% black and 52% white). The findings suggest that critical action is often associated with negative mental health outcomes; however, parent critical motivation and community anti-racism were protective in some instances and communal anti-racism action was more frequently linked to adaptive mental health outcomes than other forms of action. The findings underscore that both psychological risks and rewards are present for youth engaging in critical action for racial justice and highlight the importance of future research to identify malleable factors that are protective for these youth.

Indexed as

Mental HealthRacismAdolescentAdolescent HealthFemaleHumansMaleMotivationSocial JusticeAdolescenceAnti-racismCritical actionCritical consciousnessMental healthYouth

Identifiers

PMID35262824
OpenAlexW4221098093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.