ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2022
Improving coarse-grained models of protein folding through weighting of polar-polar/hydrophobic-hydrophobic interactions into crowded spaces.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of the Lys62Ala Mutation on the Thermal Stability ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein were tested 7 hydrophobic-polar sequences in two types of 2D-square space lattices, homogeneous and correlated, the latter simulating molecular crowding included as a geometric boundary restriction. Optimization of 2D structures was carried out using a variant of Dill's model, inspired by convex function, taking into account both hydrophobic (Dill's model) and polar interactions, including more structural information to reach better folding solutions. While using correlated networks, degrees of freedom in the folding of sequences were limited; as a result in all cases, more successful structural trials were found in comparison to a homogeneous lattice. The majority of employed sequences were designed by our workgroup, two of them were folded with other approaches, and another is a modified version of a previous sequence, initial forms of the other two have been employed but without taking into account polar-polar contributions. Three of them are newly proposed, intended to test the conjoint hydrophobic-hydrophobic and polar-polar contributions in crowded spaces. One sequence turned out to be the most difficult of the seven folded, this perhaps due to intrinsic (i) degrees of freedom and (ii) motifs of the expected 2D HP structure. Meanwhile two-sequence, although optimal folding was not achieved for neither of the two approaches, folding with correlated network approach not only produced better results than homogeneous space, but for them the best values found with crowding were very close to the expected optimal fitness. In general, five sequences were better folded with medium lattice units for correlated media; instead, another two sequences were better folded with a bit larger degree of lattice unit, revealing that depending on the degrees of freedom and particular folding, motifs in each sequence would require tuned crowding to achieve better folding. Therefore, the main goal herein was to obtain a modified 2D HP lattice model to mimic folding of proteins or secondary structures, like β-sheets, taking into account both hydrophobic-hydrophobic and polar-polar interactions, and fold them in a crowded environment. This simple but enough construction would be conducted to determine the needed information to fold sequences in a sort of a minimal but complete heuristic model. Finally, we claim that all folded sequences into crowded spaces achieve better results than homogeneous ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35262807What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.