Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262778›Full record

ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with severe COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a case series and literature review.

Sara Clemenza, Sara Zullino, Chiara Vacca, Serena Simeone, Caterina Serena, Marianna Pina Rambaldi, Serena Ottanelli, Silvia Vannuccini, Manuela Bonizzoli, Adriano Peris and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in obstetrical patients: a meta-analysis.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara ClemenzaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy. sara.clemenza@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1216-4275
Sara ZullinoDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0289-5659
Chiara VaccaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Serena SimeoneDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Caterina SerenaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Marianna Pina RambaldiDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Serena OttanelliDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Silvia VannucciniDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5790-587X
Manuela BonizzoliDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Adriano PerisDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Centre, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Massimo MicaglioDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Unit of Obstetric and Gynecologic Anesthesia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Felice PetragliaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8851-625X
Federico MecacciDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 44, 50134, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePregnant women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have a higher risk of hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and invasive ventilation, and of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In case of ARDS and critical severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is recommended when other respiratory support strategies (oxygen insufflation, non-invasive ventilation [NIV], invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube) are insufficient. However, available data on ECMO in pregnant and postpartum women with critical COVID-19 are very limited.

methodsA case series of three critically ill pregnant women who required ECMO support for COVID-19 in pregnancy and/or in the postpartum period.

resultsThe first patient tested positive for COVID-19 during the second trimester, she developed ARDS and required ECMO for 38 days. She was discharged in good general conditions and a cesarean-section [CS] at term was performed for obstetric indication. The second patient developed COVID-19-related ARDS at 28 weeks of gestation. During ECMO, she experienced a precipitous vaginal delivery at 31 weeks and 6 days of gestation. She was discharged 1 month later in good general conditions. The third patient, an obese 43-year-old woman, tested positive at 38 weeks and 2 days of gestation. Because of the worsening of clinical condition, a CS was performed, and she underwent ECMO. 143 days after the CS, she died because of sepsis and multiple organ failure (MOF). Thrombosis, hemorrhage and infections were the main complications among our patients. Neonatal outcomes have been positive.

conclusionECMO should be considered a life-saving therapy for pregnant women with severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2ARDSCOVID-19ECMOPregnancySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35262778
PMCPMC8905275
OpenAlexW4220847034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.