Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262556›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian dental journal

Validation of the brazilian version of the oral health impact profile - Aesthetic questionnaire.

Simone Assayag Hanan, Flávia Cohen-Carneiro, Fernando José Herkrath, Branca Heloisa de Oliveira, Alessandro Dourado Loguércio, Leandro de Moura Martins, Ana Paula Corrêa de Queiroz Herkrath

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian dental journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simone Assayag HananSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-8557
Flávia Cohen-CarneiroSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-6514
Fernando José HerkrathSuperior School of Health Sciences, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-0189
Branca Heloisa de OliveiraDepartment of Community and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-2479
Alessandro Dourado LoguércioSchool of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-4856
Leandro de Moura MartinsSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2469-0291
Ana Paula Corrêa de Queiroz HerkrathSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2053-5008
Universidade Federal do Amazonas · BRUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile - Aesthetic Questionnaire (OHIP-Aes-Braz) and test its psychometric properties. The questionnaire test versions were developed by a panel of experts and a pre-test was conducted in a focus group. Data used for testing its psychometric properties were obtained from a randomized controlled clinical trial on tooth bleaching. Seventy-nine Brazilian adults were included. The questionnaires were applied before tooth bleaching treatment (baseline), one week (T1), and one month after the intervention (T2). Reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency and stability, while validity was ascertained by criterion and construct validity. The sensitivity to change was assessed comparing the total scores at baseline and T2, using the Wilcoxon test (α = 0.05). Both stability and internal consistency (intra-class correlation coefficient=0.95, Cronbach's α = 0.92) proved to be adequate. Construct validity was confirmed as the correlation between OHIP-Aes-Braz scores with tooth color satisfaction and self-perceived oral health were in the expected direction. A positive correlation between OHIP-Aes-Braz and OHIP-14 (rs=0.63) and OIDP (rs=0.77) was observed. The instrument was responsive once differences in total scores before and after treatment were statistically significant (p<0.001). The OHIP-Aes-Braz presented good psychometric properties and showed sensitivity to change regarding aesthetics evaluation in Brazilian adults treated with tooth bleaching. A valid and reliable instrument allows a suitable assessment of oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian patients submitted to aesthetics dental interventions.

Indexed as

Oral HealthQuality of LifeAdultEsthetics, DentalHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35262556
PMCPMC9645140
OpenAlexW4221114956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.