ArticleJMIR research protocols2022
Toward Successful Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Practice: Protocol for a Research Program.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing AI in Hospitals to Achieve a Learning Health System: Systematic Review of Current Enablers and Barriers.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence based prediction models for individuals at risk of multiple diabetic complications: A systematic review of the literature.Journal of nursing management · 2022Pooled it
- Investigating the Implementation and Impact of AI-Assisted Fall Prevention in Hospitals: Protocol for a Multicenter, Multimethod Observational Study in Sweden (SAFE).JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- A review of application of Artificial Intelligence in breast cancer detection and treatment.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Cohort profile: The Dutch wound monitor cohort and the Swedish Region Halland Integrated Platform (RHIP) wound cohort.PloS one · 2026Article
- Integrating AI-based triage in primary care: a qualitative study of Swedish healthcare professionals' experiences applying normalization process theory.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Interpretable AI-assisted diagnosis of papillary thyroid cancer cytopathology using graph neural networks and knowledge graphs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Screen for Diabetic Neuropathy: A Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Managing risk and resilience in autonomous and intelligent systems: Exploring safety in the development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Innovation Ecosystem: Overcoming Challenges to Introducing Information-Driven Technologies in Health Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Critical activities for successful implementation and adoption of AI in healthcare: towards a process framework for healthcare organizations.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Deep Learning and Multidisciplinary Imaging in Pediatric Surgical Oncology: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- [Supporting medical and nursing activities with AI: recommendations for responsible design and use].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
- Bridging the Gap: Challenges and Strategies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Clinical Practice.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Healthcare leaders' experiences of implementing artificial intelligence for medical history-taking and triage in Swedish primary care: an interview study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- A comprehensive overview of barriers and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare: Mixed-method design.PloS one · 2024Review
- Using AI to Predict Patients' Length of Stay: PACU Staff's Needs and Expectations for Developing and Implementing an AI System.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- A Framework to Guide Implementation of AI in Health Care: Protocol for a Cocreation Research Project.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Barriers and Enablers for Implementation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Tool to Reduce the Risk of Readmission of Patients With Heart Failure: Stakeholder Interviews.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe uptake of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care is at an early stage. Recent studies have shown a lack of AI-specific implementation theories, models, or frameworks that could provide guidance for how to translate the potential of AI into daily health care practices. This protocol provides an outline for the first 5 years of a research program seeking to address this knowledge-practice gap through collaboration and co-design between researchers, health care professionals, patients, and industry stakeholders.
objectiveThe first part of the program focuses on two specific objectives. The first objective is to develop a theoretically informed framework for AI implementation in health care that can be applied to facilitate such implementation in routine health care practice. The second objective is to carry out empirical AI implementation studies, guided by the framework for AI implementation, and to generate learning for enhanced knowledge and operational insights to guide further refinement of the framework. The second part of the program addresses a third objective, which is to apply the developed framework in clinical practice in order to develop regional capacity to provide the practical resources, competencies, and organizational structure required for AI implementation; however, this objective is beyond the scope of this protocol.
methodsThis research program will use a logic model to structure the development of a methodological framework for planning and evaluating implementation of AI systems in health care and to support capacity building for its use in practice. The logic model is divided into time-separated stages, with a focus on theory-driven and coproduced framework development. The activities are based on both knowledge development, using existing theory and literature reviews, and method development by means of co-design and empirical investigations. The activities will involve researchers, health care professionals, and other stakeholders to create a multi-perspective understanding.
resultsThe project started on July 1, 2021, with the Stage 1 activities, including model overview, literature reviews, stakeholder mapping, and impact cases; we will then proceed with Stage 2 activities. Stage 1 and 2 activities will continue until June 30, 2026.
conclusionsThere is a need to advance theory and empirical evidence on the implementation requirements of AI systems in health care, as well as an opportunity to bring together insights from research on the development, introduction, and evaluation of AI systems and existing knowledge from implementation research literature. Therefore, with this research program, we intend to build an understanding, using both theoretical and empirical approaches, of how the implementation of AI systems should be approached in order to increase the likelihood of successful and widespread application in clinical practice. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/34920.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.