Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262498›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Community Health Programs Delivered Through Information and Communications Technology in High-Income Countries: Scoping Review.

Hannah Beks, Olivia King, Renee Clapham, Laura Alston, Kristen Glenister, Carol McKinstry, Claire Quilliam, Ian Wellwood, Catherine Williams, Anna Wong Shee

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Global Disparities in Teletherapy Adoption: A Cross-Income Analysis of Mental Health Access.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hannah BeksSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-6450
Olivia KingBarwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-2891
Renee ClaphamSt Vincents Health Australia, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8888-1003
Laura AlstonSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4551-8845
Kristen GlenisterDepartment of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Wangaratta, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0510-5314
Carol McKinstryLa Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6383-6313
Claire QuilliamDepartment of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Wangaratta, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7344-0133
Ian WellwoodFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Ballarat, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6059-9209
Catherine WilliamsBarwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2056-7093
Anna Wong SheeSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5095-218X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has required widespread and rapid adoption of information and communications technology (ICT) platforms by health professionals. Transitioning health programs from face-to-face to remote delivery using ICT platforms has introduced new challenges.

objectiveThe objective of this review is to scope for ICT-delivered health programs implemented within the community health setting in high-income countries and rapidly disseminate findings to health professionals.

methodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review methodology guided the review of the literature.

resultsThe search retrieved 7110 unique citations. Each title and abstract was screened by at least two reviewers, resulting in 399 citations for full-text review. Of these 399 citations, 72 (18%) were included. An additional 27 citations were identified through reviewing the reference lists of the included studies, resulting in 99 citations. Citations examined 83 ICT-delivered programs from 19 high-income countries. Variations in program design, ICT platforms, research design, and outcomes were evident.

conclusionsIncluded programs and research were heterogeneous, addressing prevalent chronic diseases. Evidence was retrieved for the effectiveness of nurse and allied health ICT-delivered programs. Findings indicated that outcomes for participants receiving ICT-delivered programs, when compared with participants receiving in-person programs, were either equivalent or better. Gaps included a paucity of co-designed programs, qualitative research around group programs, programs for patients and carers, and evaluation of cost-effectiveness. During COVID-19 and beyond, health professionals in the community health setting are encouraged to build on existing knowledge and address evidence gaps by developing and evaluating innovative ICT-delivered programs in collaboration with consumers and carers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthBiomedical TechnologyDeveloped CountriesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2community health servicesdelivery of health careinformation and communications technologymobile phonepandemicstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35262498
PMCPMC8943572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.