Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262473›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2023

Systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury and related health conditions: A scoping review.

Femke Hoekstra, Francisca Trigo, Kathryn M Sibley, Ian D Graham, Michael Kennefick, Kelly J Mrklas, Tram Nguyen, Mathew Vis-Dunbar, SC. I. Guiding Principles Consensus Panel, Heather L Gainforth

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Challenges and Facilitators to Patient and Public Involvement In Stroke Research: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Femke HoekstraSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0068-652X
Francisca TrigoCentre for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Kathryn M SibleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Ian D GrahamSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3669-1216
Michael KennefickSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Kelly J MrklasDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Tram NguyenSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mathew Vis-DunbarUBC Okanagan Library, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-9660
SC. I. Guiding Principles Consensus Panel
Heather L GainforthSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3281-1110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designScoping review.

objectiveTo identify and provide systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury (SCI) and related health conditions.

methodsFour health electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched from inception to March 2019. We included articles that described, reflected, and/or evaluated one or more collaborative research activities in health research about SCI, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, amputation, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, acquired brain injury, or wheelchair-users. Partnership principles (i.e. norms or values) and strategies (i.e. observable actions) were extracted and analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis.

resultsWe included 39 articles about SCI (n = 13), stroke (n = 15), multiple sclerosis (n = 5), amputation (n = 2), cerebral palsy (n = 2), Parkinson's disease (n = 1), and wheelchair users (n = 1). We extracted 110 principles and synthesized them into 13 overarching principles. Principles related to building and maintaining relationships between researchers and research users were most frequently reported. We identified 32 strategies that could be applied at various phases of the research process and 26 strategies that were specific to a research phase (planning, conduct, or dissemination).

conclusionWe provided systematic overviews of principles and strategies for research partnerships. These could be used by researchers and research users who want to work in partnership to plan, conduct and/or disseminate their SCI research. The findings informed the development of the new SCI Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles (www.iktprinciples.com) and will support the implementation of these Principles within the SCI research system.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyMultiple SclerosisParkinson DiseaseSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansCollaborative researchIntegrated knowledge translationKnowledge synthesesPrinciples and strategiesResearch partnershipSpinal cord injuryStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID35262473
PMCPMC10274560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.