Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262273›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

The feasibility study on the generalization of deep learning dose prediction model for volumetric modulated arc therapy of cervical cancer.

Zhang Qilin, Bao Peng, Qu Ang, Jiang Weijuan, Jiang Ping, Zhuang Hongqing, Dong Bin, Yang Ruijie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhang QilinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bao PengCenter for Data Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8447-8321
Qu AngDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiang WeijuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiang PingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhuang HongqingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dong BinBeijing International Center for Mathematical Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yang RuijieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Project Z201100005620012Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2020-2Z-40919China International Medical Foundation HDRS2020030206National key research and development program 2021YFE0202500National Natural Science Foundation of China 12090022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a 3D-Unet dose prediction model to predict the three-dimensional dose distribution of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for cervical cancer and test the dose prediction performance of the model in endometrial cancer to explore the feasibility of model generalization.

methodsOne hundred and seventeen cases of cervical cancer and 20 cases of endometrial cancer treated with VMAT were used for the model training, validation, and test. The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Eight independent channels of contoured structures were input to the model, and the dose distribution was used as the output of the model. The 3D-Unet prediction model was trained and validated on the training set (n = 86) and validation set (n = 11), respectively. Then the model was tested on the test set (n = 20) of cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, respectively. The results between clinical dose distribution and predicted dose distribution were compared in the following aspects: (a) the mean absolute error (MAE) within the body, (b) the Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) under different isodose volumes, (c) the dosimetric indexes including the mean dose (D

resultsThe model can accurately predict the dose distribution of the VMAT plan for cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. The overall average MAE and maximum MAE for cervical cancer were 2.43 ± 3.17% and 3.16 ± 4.01% of the prescribed dose, respectively, and for endometrial cancer were 2.70 ± 3.54% and 3.85 ± 3.11%. The average DSCs under different isodose volumes is above 0.9. The predicted dosimetric indexes and DVHs are equivalent to the clinical dose for both cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, and there is no statistically significant difference.

conclusionA 3D-Unet dose prediction model was developed for VMAT of cervical cancer, which can predict the dose distribution accurately for cervical cancer. The model can also be generalized for endometrial cancer with good performance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEndometrial NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedcervical cancerdeep learningdose predictiongeneralization

Identifiers

PMID35262273
PMCPMC9195039
OpenAlexW4220969051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.