Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262041›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of otorhinolaryngology2021

Mastoid Emissary Vein Canal Incidence and Its Relationship with Jugular Bulb and Sigmoid Sulcus Anatomical Variations.

Rıdvan Pekçevik, Aylin Öztürk, Yeliz Pekçevik, Onur Toka, Gülay Güçlü Aslan, İbrahim Çukurova

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pulsatile Tinnitus Due to a Large Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successfully Managed with Percutaneous Embolization in a Novel Approach.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rıdvan PekçevikDepartment of Radiology, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-5011
Aylin ÖztürkDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-0252
Yeliz PekçevikDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-3376
Onur TokaHacettepe University Faculty of Science, Department of Statistics, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-4537
Gülay Güçlü AslanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-4021-4537
İbrahim ÇukurovaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-3391
Izmir University · TRHacettepe University · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the mastoid emissary vein (MEV) canal incidence and to identify its relationship with jugular bulb (JB) and sigmoid sulcus anatomical variations. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,300 patients with temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scans in January 2016 to March 2020. The presence and the diameter of the MEV canal, and the anatomical variations of the sigmoid sulcus and the JB were reviewed by two radiologists. High riding JB, JB diverticulum, dehiscent JB, and anterior and lateral protrusion of the sigmoid sulcus were evaluated. All variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. The differences between the groups for categorical data were investigated using the chi-square test. Numeric variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney and the Kruskal-Wallis tests. Logistic regression models were constructed. Results: The study included 1,269 patients of whom 694 were female (54.7%) and 575 were male (45.3%). Their mean age was 39.01±18.47. Among them 915 (72.1%) had the right and 871 (68.6%) had the left MEV canal. Men were more likely to have the MEV canal on both sides. The presence of the right and left MEV canals was associated with the ipsilateral dominant JB/sigmoid sulcus. The left MEV canal was associated with the left high riding JB and right dehiscent JB. Conclusion: This is the largest patient population reported in the literature and allows a more precise estimate of the MEV canal incidence. We also classified the diameter of the MEV canal to identify clinically relevant, prominent MEV incidence. This is also the first study to demonstrate a relationship between the presence of the MEV canal, and the JB and sigmoid canal variations. Since both the prominent MEV and the JB variations may be symptomatic, knowing this association between them may have clinical relevance.

Indexed as

anatomyemissary veinsjugular foraminajugular veinsmultidetector computed tomographyradiologyTemporal bone

Identifiers

PMID35262041
PMCPMC8864204
OpenAlexW4210828449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.