Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35262008›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology plus2021

Interpretation of single target positivity among SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result tests.

Honorine Fenaux, Théo Ghelfenstein-Ferreira, Maud Salmona, Nadia Mahjoub, Linda Feghoul, Sarah Maylin, Marie-Laure Chaix, Marine Minier, Audrey Gabassi, Jérôme Le Goff and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Honorine FenauxLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Théo Ghelfenstein-FerreiraLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Maud SalmonaLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Nadia MahjoubLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Linda FeghoulLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Sarah MaylinLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Marie-Laure ChaixLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Marine MinierLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Audrey GabassiLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Jérôme Le GoffLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.
Constance DelaugerreLaboratoire de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis -APHP, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) recently emerged and is responsible for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Diagnostic tests have been developed, mainly based on reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). Most RT-PCR assays target at least two SARS-CoV-2 genes. In some cases, only one target gene is detected; the interpretation of such cases remains unclear. Objectives: Our objective was to analyse one target positive (OPT) RT-PCR results, using two RT-PCR assays: the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid diagnosis, "Cepheid") and the Cobas® 6800 SARS-CoV-2 Test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, "Roche"). Methods: All SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results performed on respiratory samples with the Roche or the Cepheid tests, from 23rd March to 6th August 2020 were collected. A patient with an OPT result was classified as "probable COVID-19" if they met at least one of the three following criteria: (i) history of a two gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result, (ii) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody (IgG) detection or (iii) compatible chest computed tomography scan (CT-scan). Results: A total of 18,630 and 1189 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests were performed with the Roche and Cepheid tests, respectively. Among the positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, 293 samples - corresponding to 264 patients - were OPT (11% of the positive samples). Of these patients, 180 (68%) had at least one of the three criteria listed above and were classified as probable COVID-19. Conclusions: Sixty-eight percent of the patients with an OPT result were classified as probable COVID-19 and are probably at a late stage of infection. Serology and imaging can be helpful to confirm diagnosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19Molecular biologyOne target positive RT-PCR resultSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35262008
PMCPMC8126374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.