Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35261948›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2022

International Retrospective Cohort Study of Conversion Therapy for Stage IV Gastric Cancer 1 (CONVO-GC-1).

Kazuhiro Yoshida, Itaru Yasufuku, Masanori Terashima, Sun Young Rha, Jae Moon Bae, Guoxin Li, Hitoshi Katai, Masahiko Watanabe, Yasuyuki Seto, Sung Hoon Noh and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 therapy for patients with large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer: short-term outcomes of a multicenter, phase II study (OGSG1902).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery following chemotherapy for cStage IVb gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Diagnostic performance of staging laparoscopy after chemotherapy and the prognostic impact of peritoneal disease resolution in advanced gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognosis-predicting factor of gastrectomy after systemic cancer therapy for cStage IVB gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kazuhiro YoshidaDepartment of Surgical Oncology School of Medicine Gifu University Gifu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1408-0104
Itaru YasufukuDepartment of Surgical Oncology School of Medicine Gifu University Gifu Japan.
Masanori TerashimaDepartment of Gastric Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2967-8267
Sun Young RhaDepartment of Medical Oncology Yonsei University Seoul Korea.
Jae Moon BaeDepartment of Surgery Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery Southern Medical University Guangzhou China.
Hitoshi KataiDepartment of Gastric Surgery National Cancer Center Tokyo Japan.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Surgery Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-8752
Sung Hoon NohDepartment of Surgery Yonsei University Seoul Korea.
Han- Kwang YangDepartment of Surgery Seoul National University Seoul Korea.
Jiafu JiDepartment of Surgery Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing China.
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-2550
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery Keio University Tokyo Japan.
Satoshi MoritaDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Masahiko NishiyamaHigashi Sapporo Hospital Sapporo Japan.
Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Nagoya University Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7474
CONVO‐GC‐1 Study Group, Federation of Asian Clinical Oncology (FACO)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Much attention has been paid to conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer, however, its operative comorbidities and survival benefit have not yet been clarified. CONVO-GC-1, an international retrospective cohort study, was designed to investigate the role of conversion surgery in Japan, Korea, and China. Methods: The rate of operative complications was the primary endpoint and the overall survival (OS), according to the four-category criteria previously published (Gastric Cancer:19; 2016), was analyzed as the secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 1206 patients underwent surgery after chemotherapy with curative intent. Operative complications were observed in 290 (24.0%) patients in all grades, including pancreatic fistula and surgical site infection. The median survival time (MST) of all resected patients was 36.7 mo (M) and those of R0, R1, and R2 resection were 56.6 M, 25.8 M, and 21.7 M, respectively. Moreover, the MST of R0 patients were 47.8 M, 116.7 M, 44.8 M in categories 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and not reached in category 4. Interestingly, the MST of P1 patients was as favorable as that of P0CY1 patients if R0 resection was achieved. The MST of patients with liver metastasis was also favorable regardless of the number of lesions, and the MST of patients with para-aortic lymph node (LN) No 16a1/b2 metastasis was not inferior to that of patients with para-aortic LN No 16a2/b1 metastasis. Conclusion: Conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer is safe and could be a new therapeutic strategy to improve the survival of patients, especially those with R0 resection.

Indexed as

adjuvant surgerychemotherapyconversion therapygastric cancermetastatic gastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID35261948
PMCPMC8889854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.