ReviewHuman reproduction open2022
Oocyte activation deficiency and assisted oocyte activation: mechanisms, obstacles and prospects for clinical application.
Review in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07570342 (Comparison of Two Types of Calcium), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Two Types of Calcium (Ca²⁺) Ionophore Treatments for Oocyte Activation in Cases of Suboptimal Fertilization Potential
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the impact of calcium ionophore on pregnancy outcomes in artificial oocyte activation cycles: a 10-year update of systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Phospholipase C Zeta in Human Spermatozoa: A Systematic Review on Current Development and Clinical Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- A catalytically competent sperm PLCzeta variant causes fertilization failure through protein insufficiency.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Insights into The Outcomes of Artificial Oocyte Activation: A Retrospecive Analysis of 1,300 Couples Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2026Article
- Reduced and Mislocalized ACTL7A in Globozoospermia: Implications for Sperm Chromatin Integrity and Infertility.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Assisted oocyte activation re-envisioned: a more physiological approach.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Serum trace and heavy metal exposure and IVF/ICSI outcomes: modifying effects of maternal diet in a prospective cohort.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Characterization and therapy of fertilization failure in murine and human models with HNRNPR mutations.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Precise mimicry of physiological CaBioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- The efficacy of ionomycin - induced artificial oocyte activation in preventing fertilization failure in an ICSI cycle: an eight - year retrospective study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Factors affecting the intracytoplasmic sperm cell injection outcomes: A meta-analysis of porcine studies.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Of mice and men: translating mouse knockout models of human male infertility.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- Effect of Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Chromatin Decondensation on PLCζ Efficacy in Infertile Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Identification of nonfunctional CABS1 causing fertilization failure and male infertility in humans: a case report.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- A Transcriptomics Approach to Unveil the Antioxidant Effects of Tryptophan on Oocyte Quality Under Oxidative Stress in Pigs.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Phospholipase Cζ, the Molecular Spark of Fertilization and Male Infertility: Insights from Bench to Bedside.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Add-On Technologies That Aim to Improve Oocyte Quality and Embryo Implantation Potential.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- In vitro gametogenesis: Towards competent oocytes: Limitations and future improvements for generating oocytes from pluripotent stem cells in culture.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOocyte activation deficiency (OAD) is attributed to the majority of cases underlying failure of ICSI cycles, the standard treatment for male factor infertility. Oocyte activation encompasses a series of concerted events, triggered by sperm-specific phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ), which elicits increases in free cytoplasmic calcium (Ca OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: Recent advances in current AOA techniques warrant a review of the safety and efficacy of these practices, to determine the extent to which AOA may be implemented in the clinic. Importantly, the primary challenges to obtaining data on the safety and efficacy of AOA must be determined. Such questions require urgent attention before widespread clinical utilization of such protocols can be advocated. SEARCH
methodsA literature review was performed using databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, etc. using AOA, OAD, calcium ionophores, ICSI, PLCζ, oocyte activation, failed fertilization and fertilization failure as keywords. Relevant articles published until June 2019 were analysed and included in the review, with an emphasis on studies assessing large-scale efficacy and safety. OUTCOMES: Contradictory studies on the safety and efficacy of AOA do not yet allow for the establishment of AOA as standard practice in the clinic. Heterogeneity in study methodology, inconsistent sample inclusion criteria, non-standardized outcome assessments, restricted sample size and animal model limitations render AOA strictly experimental. The main scientific concern impeding AOA utilization in the clinic is the non-physiological method of Ca LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The number of studies with clinical relevance using AOA remains significantly low. A much wider range of studies examining outcomes using multiple AOA agents are required. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: In addition to addressing the five main challenges of studies assessing AOA safety and efficacy, more standardized, large-scale, multi-centre studies of AOA, as well as long-term follow-up studies of children born from AOA, would provide evidence for establishing AOA as a treatment for infertility. The delivery of an activating agent that can more accurately recapitulate physiological fertilization, such as recombinant PLCζ, is a promising prospect for the future of AOA. Further to PLCζ, many other avenues of physiological oocyte activation also require urgent investigation to assess other potential physiological avenues of AOA. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: D.G. was supported by Stanford University's Bing Overseas Study Program. J.K. was supported by a Healthcare Research Fellowship Award (HF-14-16) made by Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW), alongside a National Science, Technology, and Innovation plan (NSTIP) project grant (15-MED4186-20) awarded by the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.