Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35261894›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Survival outcomes in unresectable metastatic rectal cancer patients after both primary site resection and chemoradiotherapy: a SEER-based observational study.

Jianan Chen, Haipeng Chen, Fuqiang Zhao, Zheng Wang, Qian Liu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianan Chen *Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Haipeng Chen *Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fuqiang Zhao *Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qian LiuDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The liver is the most common site for rectal cancer metastasis, and liver resection combined with chemotherapy is the only treatment offering the possibility of long-term survival in patients with metastatic rectal cancer. However, a significant proportion of liver metastases cannot be surgically removed, and very limited data are available regarding the survival outcomes of these patients. This study aimed to investigate the survival pattern of rectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases after both chemoradiotherapy and primary tumor resection. Methods: A total of 51,178 rectal cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, of whom 448 had synchronous liver metastases and underwent both chemoradiotherapy and primary tumor resection. According to different treatment modalities, patients were divided into a hepatic resectable group and an unresectable group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate patient survival, and differences between the hepatic resectable and unresectable groups were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze independent prognostic factors for unresectable tumors. Results: Among the 448 metastatic rectal cancer patients, 60.3% (270) had unresectable liver metastasis. The median survival period, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, and 5-year OS rate of the unresectable group were 37.0 months, 68.5%, and 32.9%, respectively, compared with 56.0 months, 87.4%, and 48.0%, respectively, in the hepatic resectable group (P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that a poor or undifferentiated histological type was independently associated with poor CSS in patients with unresectable liver metastases (P=0.001). Conclusions: Primary tumor resection combined with chemoradiotherapy might be able to yield a satisfactory survival outcome in unresectable metastatic rectal cancer patients. Resection of liver metastases remains the primary treatment for prolonging the OS and CSS time in stage IV patients.

Indexed as

liver metastasisprimary tumor resectionprognosisRectal cancerthe surveillance, Epidemiology, and End results database (SEER)

Identifiers

PMID35261894
PMCPMC8841683
OpenAlexW4205860471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.