ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
Bone metastasis of esophageal carcinoma diagnosed as a first primary tumor: a population-based study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Occult Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Presenting as Bone-Predominant Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: A Case Report of a p40-Negative Vertebral Metastasis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced esophageal cancer with bone metastases: Prognostic biomarkers and palliative treatment.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Two novel clinical tools to predict the risk of bone metastasis and overall survival in esophageal cancer patients: a large population-based retrospective cohort study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore predictors of bone metastasis (BM) of esophageal carcinoma (EC) and factors affecting the prognosis of EC with BM (ECBM). Methods: We retrospectively studied the data of EC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of BM. Cox regression and Fine and Gray's competing risk regression were performed to identify prognostic factors associated with all-cause and cancer-specific death, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess survival. Results: After exclusion, 8,916 patients were eligible, of whom 462 (5.2%) had ECBM. Independent risk factors of BM were age <65 years, male sex, stage T1, advanced N stage, and non-bone organ metastases. For EC, the median survival time (MST) was 17 months, and the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 31.6% and 23.3%, respectively; meanwhile, for BM, the MST was 5 months, and the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 2% and 1%, respectively. Adenocarcinoma, stage T2, the absence of non-bone organ metastases, and combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death in ECBM patients. Stage T2, the absence of non-bone organ metastases, and combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific death in ECBM patients. Conclusions: Although rare, BM severely impairs the prognosis of EC. BM predictors and factors influencing the prognosis of ECBM may help distinguish high-risk patients with BM and assess survival in ECBM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.