Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35261888›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

A meta-analysis comparing hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Leye Yan, Junqing Lin, Kun Ke, Zhengzhong Wu, Jingyao Huang, Ning Huang, Weizhu Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. VPS9D1-AS1: a critical oncogenic long non-coding RNA in human malignancies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leye YanInterventional Radiology Department, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Junqing LinInterventional Radiology Department, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Kun KeInterventional Radiology Department, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zhengzhong WuInterventional Radiology Department, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jingyao HuangInterventional Radiology Department, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ning HuangInterventional Radiology Department, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Weizhu YangInterventional Radiology Department, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diagnosed in an advanced stage. Although sorafenib is recommended as the standard treatment for advanced HCC, its efficacy is limited. In some studies, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy has demonstrated a significant therapeutic benefit for advanced HCC compared with sorafenib. We systematically evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib for advanced HCC. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2020 was conducted. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse effects. The hazard ratio and odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure the pooled effect. Results: Eighteen retrospective or prospective cohort studies and one prospective controlled study were included, with 1,339 patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and 1,060 patients treated with sorafenib. We found that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was superior to sorafenib in terms of OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.95, P=0.027], PFS (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.44-0.69, P<0.001), ORR [assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): OR: 9.02, 95% CI: 6.01-13.53, P<0.001; assessed using modified RECIST: odds ratio (OR): 3.71, 95% CI: 1.92-7.16, P<0.001], and DCR (assessed using RECIST: OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.40-3.83, P=0.001; assessed by modified RECIST: OR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.22-4.28, P=0.01). Dermatological adverse effects and hypertension were significantly higher in the sorafenib group for all grades of adverse effects. However, regarding severe adverse effects, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was associated with more frequent leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety for advanced HCC compared with sorafenib and should be recommended for suitable patients with advanced HCC.

Indexed as

hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)meta-analysissorafenib

Identifiers

PMID35261888
PMCPMC8841468
OpenAlexW4206241736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.