Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35261733›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2022

Comparing aerosol number and mass exhalation rates from children and adults during breathing, speaking and singing.

Justice Archer, Lauren P McCarthy, Henry E Symons, Natalie A Watson, Christopher M Orton, William J Browne, Joshua Harrison, Benjamin Moseley, Keir E J Philip, James D Calder and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Justice ArcherSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lauren P McCarthySchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3006-2985
Henry E SymonsSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Natalie A WatsonDepartment of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christopher M OrtonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
William J BrowneSchool of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Joshua HarrisonSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Benjamin MoseleyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Keir E J PhilipDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
James D CalderDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Pallav L ShahDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Bryan R BzdekSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Declan CostelloEar, Nose and Throat Department, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK.
Jonathan P ReidSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6022-1778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerosol particles of respirable size are exhaled when individuals breathe, speak and sing and can transmit respiratory pathogens between infected and susceptible individuals. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into focus the need to improve the quantification of the particle number and mass exhalation rates as one route to provide estimates of viral shedding and the potential risk of transmission of viruses. Most previous studies have reported the number and mass concentrations of aerosol particles in an exhaled plume. We provide a robust assessment of the absolute particle number and mass exhalation rates from measurements of minute ventilation using a non-invasive Vyntus Hans Rudolf mask kit with straps housing a rotating vane spirometer along with measurements of the exhaled particle number concentrations and size distributions. Specifically, we report comparisons of the number and mass exhalation rates for children (12-14 years old) and adults (19-72 years old) when breathing, speaking and singing, which indicate that child and adult cohorts generate similar amounts of aerosol when performing the same activity. Mass exhalation rates are typically 0.002-0.02 ng s

Indexed as

aerosolairborne transmissionexhalationrespiratory pathogens

Identifiers

PMID35261733
PMCPMC8831083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.