Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35261560›Full record

ReviewNotfall & rettungsmedizin2022

[Best practice-example of a paramedic competence system in the context of user and patient safety: the Reutlinger Weg].

Benjamin Schempf, Wolfgang Dorau, Fabian Eppler, Niklas Heinemann, Markus Metzger, David Häske

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Notfall & rettungsmedizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin SchempfDRK Rettungsdienst Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland.
Wolfgang DorauDRK Rettungsdienst Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland.
Fabian EpplerDRK Rettungsdienst Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland.
Niklas HeinemannDRK Rettungsdienst Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland.
Markus MetzgerDRK Rettungsdienst Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland.
David HäskeDRK Rettungsdienst Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0001-5190-3937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discussion about the competencies and responsibilities of paramedics has been going on for decades and is the subject of controversial legal debates and currently the focus of political attention due to the heterogeneous country-specific design. However, there are only a few published examples of a so-called competency system for the safe and effective use of prehospital emergency medicine interventions. The practical experience of a competence system is presented. Adequate education and training are crucial for development of competence. A physician-supported quality assurance system creates the opportunity to confirm the competencies of paramedics within the framework of competence checks, monitor the system by means of indicators, and detect weak points at an early stage. Safety culture must be exemplified. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are the guideline for implementation. In a competence system, certified paramedics can be granted authorization and thus contribute to rapid and efficient patient care, while keeping emergency physicians available for indications requiring their competencies.

Indexed as

GuidelinesMedical didacticsQuality assuranceSafety cultureTraining

Identifiers

PMID35261560
PMCPMC8890017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.