ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2022
Truncating fined-tuned vision-based models to lightweight deployable diagnostic tools for SARS-CoV-2 infected chest X-rays and CT-scans.
Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review on Deep Structured Learning for COVID-19 Screening Using Chest CT from 2020 to 2022.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- COVID-19 and pneumonia diagnosis from chest X-ray images using convolutional neural networks.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Ensemble of Deep Neural Networks based on Condorcet's Jury Theorem for screening Covid-19 and Pneumonia from radiograph images.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- SEL-COVIDNET: An intelligent application for the diagnosis of COVID-19 from chest X-rays and CT-scans.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In such a brief period, the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) already infected large populations worldwide. Diagnosing an infected individual requires a Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test, which can become expensive and limited in most developing countries, making them rely on alternatives like Chest X-Rays (CXR) or Computerized Tomography (CT) scans. However, results from these imaging approaches radiated confusion for medical experts due to their similarities with other diseases like pneumonia. Other solutions based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) recently improved and automated the diagnosis of COVID-19 from CXRs and CT scans. However, upon examination, most proposed studies focused primarily on accuracy rather than deployment and reproduction, which may cause them to become difficult to reproduce and implement in locations with inadequate computing resources. Therefore, instead of focusing only on accuracy, this work investigated the effects of parameter reduction through a proposed truncation method and analyzed its effects. Various DCNNs had their architectures truncated, which retained only their initial core block, reducing their parameter sizes to <1 M. Once trained and validated, findings have shown that a DCNN with robust layer aggregations like the InceptionResNetV2 had less vulnerability to the adverse effects of the proposed truncation. The results also showed that from its full-length size of 55 M with 98.67% accuracy, the proposed truncation reduced its parameters to only 441 K and still attained an accuracy of 97.41%, outperforming other studies based on its size to performance ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.