Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35261178›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2022

Novel molecular biomarkers of cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity in adult population: a scoping review.

Irene Cartas-Espinel, Marcelino Telechea-Fernández, Carlos Manterola Delgado, Andrés Ávila Barrera, Nicolás Saavedra Cuevas, Angela L Riffo-Campos

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Early detection of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene Cartas-EspinelPrograma de Doctorado en Ciencias mención Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Marcelino Telechea-FernándezDepartamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos Manterola DelgadoDepartamento de Cirugía, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Andrés Ávila BarreraCentro de Excelencia de Modelación y Computación Científica, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Nicolás Saavedra CuevasDepartamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Angela L Riffo-CamposPrograma de Doctorado en Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6300-3338
Universidad de La Frontera · CLUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCancer treatments are associated with cardiotoxic events that predispose to cardiac pathology and compromise the survival of patients, making necessary the identification of new molecular biomarkers to detect cardiotoxicity. This scoping review aims to identify the available evidence on novel molecular biomarkers associated with cardiotoxicity in the adult population undergoing cancer therapy. METHODS AND

resultsThe databases Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were screened for the identification of published studies until 23 August 2020, searching for novel molecular biomarkers reported in cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in adult patients. A total of 42 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Fourteen studies reported 44 new protein biomarkers, 18 studies reported 57 new single nucleotide polymorphism biomarkers, and 11 studies reported 171 new gene expression profiles associated with cardiotoxicity. Data were extracted for 272 novel molecular biomarkers reported and evaluated in 7084 cancer patients, of which only 13 were identified in more than one study (MPO, sST2, GDF-15, TGF-B1, rs1056892, rs1883112, rs4673, rs13058338, rs1695, miR-1, miR-25-3p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-423-5p), showing values for area under the curve > 0.73 (range 0.74-0.85), odds ratio 0.26-7.17, and hazard ratio 1.28-1.80.

conclusionsMultiple studies presented a significant number of novel molecular biomarkers as promising predictors for risk assessment of cardiac dysfunction related to cancer therapy, but the characteristics of the studies carried out and the determinations applied do not allow suggesting the clinical use of these molecular biomarkers in the assessment of cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesMicroRNAsNeoplasmsAdultBiomarkersCardiotoxicityHumansBiomarkersMicroRNAsCancer therapyCardio-oncology/onco-cardiologyCardiotoxicityCTRCDLVEFMolecular biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35261178
PMCPMC9065865
OpenAlexW4221006495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.