Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35261136›Full record

ReviewDermatologic therapy2022

Remarkable efficiency of surgical shave excision of keloids followed by intralesional injection of Bleomycin. A retrospective study of 314 cases.

Olivier Vanhooteghem

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Scar Management in Pediatric Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  3. Efficacy of bleomycin and sirolimus in inhibiting CD31Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivier VanhooteghemDermatology Department, CHU UCL Site Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-2566
CHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of a keloid treatment consisting of intradermal surgical shave excision followed by intralesional injections of Bleomycin. A retrospective study performed in the Department of Dermatology, CHU UCL Namur Sainte Elisabeth Clinic, Belgium between 2018 and 2019, on 314 patients with keloids-average age: 32 years (range 19-62). Patients were treated first by surgical shave excision and then after reepithelialization, monthly Bleomycin injections were used until the itching and/or pain ceased and the keloid disappeared. The satisfaction index based on Vancouver Scar Scale on the 314 patients was as follows: 87% of the patients were very satisfied with complete flattening (276 patients), 11% were moderated satisfied with significant flattening (32 patients), and 2% show recurrences (6 patients). Pain and itching disappear totally (100% of patients) based on Visual Analogue Scale. The absence of recurrence within 24 months of the last injection, leads us to believe that this can be a first choice and low-cost treatment, whatever the phototype and the size of the lesion. This treatment can be given in all regions of the world, including in non-industrialized or developing countries.

Indexed as

KeloidAdultBleomycinHumansInjections, IntralesionalMiddle AgedPainPruritusRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBleomycinBleomycinintralesionalkeloidscarshave surgery

Identifiers

PMID35261136
PMCPMC9285601
OpenAlexW4220922618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.