ArticleLa Tunisie medicale
Severity factors in Algerian patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDetermining the profile of COVID-19 patients with low pulsed hemoglobin saturation in oxygen (SpO2) could help clinicians identify those with a poor prognosis.
aimTo identify and to compare the clinical, biological and radiological data of Algerian patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and divided according to the SpO2 measured at admission, at rest, and in ambient air.
methodsA prospective study was carried out on Algerian patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the period from March 9 to April 30, 2020. The general characteristics of the patients and the clinical, biological and radiological data were determined.
results86 patients were included in the study [G1: SpO2 >95% (n=51) and G2: SpO2 ≤95% (n=35)]. Compared to G1, G2 was older (48±14 vs. 61±12 years, p=0.0001), included more patients aged ≥ 50 years (37.2 vs. 80.0%, p=0.0001), having an arterial-hypertension (21.6 vs. 45.7%, p=0.0180), a cancer (0.0 vs. 14.3%, p=0.0054), an anemia (25.6 vs. 56.3%, p=0.0069), a leukocytosis (4.7 vs. 21.9%, p=0.0236), a biological inflammatory syndrome (82.5 vs. 100%, p=0.0142), a hyper-uremia (7.0 vs. 37.5%, p=0.0185), a hyper-creatininaemia (4.7 vs. 18.8%, p=0.0356), a tissue damage (41.0 vs. 66.7%, p=0.0341), a diffuse ground-glass opacity (52.0 vs. 71.4%, p=0.0397), band condensations (30.0 vs. 54.3%, p=0.0244), a severe extension (2.0 vs. 25.7%, p=0.0008), and included fewer patients who complained from diarrhea (49.0 vs. 22.9%, p=0.0145), having a nodular ground-glass (66.0 vs. 40.0%, p=0.0177) and a slight extension (78.0 vs. 40.0%, p=0.0004).
conclusionCriteria associated with low SpO2 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients were advanced age, a history of arterial-hypertension and cancer, high frequencies of certain biological abnormalities or radiological signs. The diarrhea symptom, the radiological appearance of nodular ground glass, and a slight extension of the radiological lesions appear as protective elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35261005PMC8796682W4287518757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.