Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260985›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Nociception level index variations in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a pilot study.

Tanya M Santella, Philippe Richebé, Nadia Godin, Véronique Brulotte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanya M SantellaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, 5415 boul. L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Philippe RichebéDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, 5415 boul. L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Nadia GodinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, 5415 boul. L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Véronique BrulotteDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, 5415 boul. L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada. veronique.brulotte@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8901-8554
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nociception level index (NOL) is a multi-parameter index that incorporates changes in autonomic parameters to evaluate nociception, with more painful stimuli causing more pronounced index variations. How this nociception monitor relates to the pain experience is uncertain, and patients with chronic pain may respond differently to acute pain due to alterations in pain processing. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate NOL index variations after a painful physiotherapy exercise in patients with upper limb complex regional pain syndrome. Baseline NOL indexes were recorded using a finger probe (PMD-200™ Monitor, Medasense, Israel) and patient reported baseline pain scores using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients then performed a painful physiotherapy exercise and NOL index and pain scores were again recorded. The same procedure and recordings were repeated after a stellate ganglion block. Data were analyzed using a paired Student T test and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Twenty patients (12/20 female, 10/20 right-sided) were included in this study. Patients reported moderate baseline pain (4.0 ± 2.7) despite having a low baseline NOL index (7.66 ± 5.76 out of 100). NRS and NOL index scores increased significantly during exercise, both before and after the block. The NOL index increased significantly when patients reported increased pain, indicating that it could eventually be useful in the objective assessment of acute pain in the chronic pain patients. However, NOL index was not able to reflect pain levels at rest, before the painful stimulation, in this chronic pain population. Further studies are needed to better assess NOL index utility at rest and to confirm these findings in this specific chronic pain population.

Indexed as

Acute PainChronic PainComplex Regional Pain SyndromesFemaleHeart RateHumansNociceptionPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsChronic painComplex regional pain syndromeNOL indexObjective pain assessment

Identifiers

PMID35260985
OpenAlexW4220838547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.