Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260972›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022

Preoperative embolisation of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Conor Brosnan, Michael Amoo, Mohsen Javadpour

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Conor BrosnanNational Neurosurgical Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, D09 V2N0, Ireland. conorbrosnan@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-5164
Michael AmooNational Neurosurgical Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, D09 V2N0, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6886-6714
Mohsen JavadpourNational Neurosurgical Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, D09 V2N0, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9836-1741
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative embolisation is a commonly performed adjunct to microsurgical excision of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs), with aims such as lessening the technical difficulty of the microsurgical procedure, reducing operative time, decreasing blood loss, and improving patient functional outcomes. We aim to perform a systematic review of randomised trials and cohort studies evaluating preoperative embolisation of bAVMs published between 01 January 2000 and 31 March 2021 and appraise its role in clinical practice. A MEDLINE search was performed, and articles reporting on outcomes following preoperative embolisation, as an adjunct to microsurgery, were eligible for inclusion. PRISMA reporting and Cochrane Handbook guidelines were followed. The primary outcome measure was the risk of complications associated with preoperative embolisation. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021244231). Of the 1661 citations, 8 studies with 588 patients met predefined inclusion criteria. No studies specifically compared outcomes of surgical excision of bAVMs between those with and without preoperative embolisation. Spetzler Martin (SM) grading was available in 301 cases. 123 of 298 (41⋅28%) patients presented with haemorrhage. Complications related to embolisation occurred in 175/588 patients (29.4%, 95% CI 19.6-40.2). Permanent neurological deficits occurred in 36/541 (6%, 95% CI 3.9-8.5) and mortality in 6/588 (0.41%, 95% CI 0-1.4). This is the first systematic review evaluating preoperative embolisation of bAVMs. Existing studies assessing this intervention are of poor quality. Associated complication rates are significant. Based on published literature, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend preoperative embolisation of AVMs. Further studies are required to ascertain if there are benefits of this procedure and if so, in which cases.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsBrainHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArteriovenous malformationBrainCerebralEmbolisationPreoperativeSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35260972
PMCPMC9160113
OpenAlexW4220960136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.