SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022
Preoperative embolisation of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal timing of microsurgical resection after preoperative embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,469 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Distal Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm Associated with Arteriovenous Malformation: A Case Report.NMC case report journal · 2026Article
- Forehead Arteriovenous Malformation Embolization Complicated by Glue Migration into the Cavernous Sinus: A Case Report of a Rare Complication.Archives of plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Pediatric Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: A Ten-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Challenging Management of a Rare Complex Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation in the Corpus Callosum and Post-Central Gyrus: A Case Study of a 41-Year-Old Female.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of conservative management, microsurgery only, and microsurgery with preoperative embolization for unruptured arteriovenous malformations: A propensity score weighted prospective cohort study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Predicting intraoperative major blood loss in microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Brain arteriovenous malformations of the middle cerebral artery region: image characteristics and endovascular treatment based on a new classification system.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- State of the Art in the Role of Endovascular Embolization in the Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery alone for brain arteriovenous malformation.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative embolisation is a commonly performed adjunct to microsurgical excision of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs), with aims such as lessening the technical difficulty of the microsurgical procedure, reducing operative time, decreasing blood loss, and improving patient functional outcomes. We aim to perform a systematic review of randomised trials and cohort studies evaluating preoperative embolisation of bAVMs published between 01 January 2000 and 31 March 2021 and appraise its role in clinical practice. A MEDLINE search was performed, and articles reporting on outcomes following preoperative embolisation, as an adjunct to microsurgery, were eligible for inclusion. PRISMA reporting and Cochrane Handbook guidelines were followed. The primary outcome measure was the risk of complications associated with preoperative embolisation. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021244231). Of the 1661 citations, 8 studies with 588 patients met predefined inclusion criteria. No studies specifically compared outcomes of surgical excision of bAVMs between those with and without preoperative embolisation. Spetzler Martin (SM) grading was available in 301 cases. 123 of 298 (41⋅28%) patients presented with haemorrhage. Complications related to embolisation occurred in 175/588 patients (29.4%, 95% CI 19.6-40.2). Permanent neurological deficits occurred in 36/541 (6%, 95% CI 3.9-8.5) and mortality in 6/588 (0.41%, 95% CI 0-1.4). This is the first systematic review evaluating preoperative embolisation of bAVMs. Existing studies assessing this intervention are of poor quality. Associated complication rates are significant. Based on published literature, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend preoperative embolisation of AVMs. Further studies are required to ascertain if there are benefits of this procedure and if so, in which cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.