Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260794›Full record

SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2023

Long term genitourinary toxicity following curative intent intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rowan David, Alex Buckby, Arman A Kahokehr, Jason Lee, David I Watson, John Leung, Michael E O'Callaghan

Open access · hybridFull text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of image-guided radiation therapy with intraprostatic seeds on long-term toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing risk-adapted intensification therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dosimetric benefits of half-field arc in prostate cancer treatment.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. BMJ open · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rowan DavidCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, Flinders University, Bedford, SA, Australia. rowanvictordavid@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4483-1204
Alex BuckbyDepartment of Urology, SA Health, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford, SA, Australia.
Arman A KahokehrCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, Flinders University, Bedford, SA, Australia.
Jason LeeCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, Flinders University, Bedford, SA, Australia.
David I WatsonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, Flinders University, Bedford, SA, Australia.
John LeungCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, Flinders University, Bedford, SA, Australia.
Michael E O'CallaghanCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, Flinders University, Bedford, SA, Australia.
Flinders University · AUFlinders Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have shown that radiation-induced pelvic toxicity often requires urological consultation. However, the 10-year incidence of genitourinary toxicity following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) amongst patients with localised prostate cancer remains unclear. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of late genitourinary toxicity relying on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade as well as the incidence of specific genitourinary toxicity. Secondary objectives involved quantifing the number of studies reporting 120-month follow-up endpoints, time to event analysis, predictive factors or economic evaluation.

methodsArticles published from January 2008 to December 2021 describing prospective studies were systematically searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane (PROSPERO protocol CRD42019133320). Quality assessment was performed by use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool for RCTs and the Newcastle Ottowa Scale for non-RCTs. Meta-analysis was performed on the 60-month incidence of RTOG and CTCAE Grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity, haematuria, urinary retention and urinary incontinence.

resultsWe screened 4721 studies and six studies met our inclusion criteria. All included studies involved normofractionation, three included a hypofractionation comparator arm and none involved nodal irradiation. The pooled 60-month cumulative incidence of RTOG and CTCAE Grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity were 17% (95% CI: 5-20%, n = 678) and 33% (95% CI: 27-38%, n = 153), respectively. The pooled 60-month cumulative incidence of Haematuria was 5% (95% CI: -4-14%, n = 48), Urinary incontinence 12% (95% CI: 6-18%, n = 194), Urinary retention 24% (95% CI: 9-40%, n = 10). One study reported time to event analyses, one reported predictive factors, no studies reported economic analysis or 120-month toxicity. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst the studies.

conclusionThere are few high-quality studies reporting 60-month toxicity rates after IMRT. Conservative estimates of 60-month toxicity rates are high and there is need for longer follow-up and consistent toxicity reporting standards.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedUrinary IncontinenceUrinary RetentionHematuriaHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35260794
PMCPMC10023565
OpenAlexW4221040866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read66
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.