Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260741›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Exploring the mechanical and morphological rationality of tree branch structure based on 3D point cloud analysis and the finite element method.

Satoru Tsugawa, Kaname Teratsuji, Fumio Okura, Koji Noshita, Masaki Tateno, Jingyao Zhang, Taku Demura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Satoru TsugawaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Systems Science and Technology, Akita Prefectural University, Akita, 015-0055, Japan. tsugawa@akita-pu.ac.jp.
Kaname TeratsujiDepartment of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 615-8540, Japan.
Fumio OkuraGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Koji NoshitaDepartment of Biology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Masaki TatenoNikko Botanical Garden, Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tochigi, 321-1435, Japan.
Jingyao ZhangDepartment of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 615-8540, Japan.
Taku DemuraGraduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trees are thought to have acquired a mechanically optimized shape through evolution, but a scientific methodology to investigate the mechanical rationality of tree morphology remains to be established. The aim of this study was to develop a new method for 3D reconstruction of actual tree shape and to establish a theoretical formulation for elucidating the structure and function of tree branches. We obtained 3D point cloud data of tree shape of Japanese zelkova (Zelkova serrata) and Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) using the NavVis Lidar scanner, then applied a cylinder structure extraction from point cloud data with error estimation. We then formulated the mechanical stress of branches under gravity using the elastic theory, and performed finite element method simulations to evaluate the mechanical characteristics. Subsequently, we constructed a mechanics-based theoretical formulation of branch development that ensures constant bending stress produces various branching patterns depending on growth properties. The derived theory recapitulates the trade-off among branch growth anisotropy, stress-gravity length, and branch shape, which may open the quantitative way to evaluate mechanical and morphological rationality of tree branches.

Indexed as

LarixTreesFinite Element AnalysisGravitationStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID35260741
PMCPMC8904476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.