Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260586›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Carbon defect qubit in two-dimensional WS

Song Li, Gergő Thiering, Péter Udvarhelyi, Viktor Ivády, Adam Gali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Solid State Defect Emitters With no Electrical Activity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A substitutional quantum defect in WSNature communications · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of an Oxygen Defect in Hexagonal Boron Nitride.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Song LiWigner Research Centre for Physics, P.O. Box 49, Budapest, H-1525, Hungary.
Gergő ThieringWigner Research Centre for Physics, P.O. Box 49, Budapest, H-1525, Hungary.
Péter UdvarhelyiWigner Research Centre for Physics, P.O. Box 49, Budapest, H-1525, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-1664
Viktor IvádyWigner Research Centre for Physics, P.O. Box 49, Budapest, H-1525, Hungary.
Adam GaliWigner Research Centre for Physics, P.O. Box 49, Budapest, H-1525, Hungary. gali.adam@wigner.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-5470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying and fabricating defect qubits in two-dimensional semiconductors are of great interest in exploring candidates for quantum information and sensing applications. A milestone has been recently achieved by demonstrating that single defect, a carbon atom substituting sulphur atom in single layer tungsten disulphide, can be engineered on demand at atomic size level precision, which holds a promise for a scalable and addressable unit. It is an immediate quest to reveal its potential as a qubit. To this end, we determine its electronic structure and optical properties from first principles. We identify the fingerprint of the neutral charge state of the defect in the scanning tunnelling spectrum. In the neutral defect, the giant spin-orbit coupling mixes the singlet and triplet excited states with resulting in phosphorescence at the telecom band that can be used to read out the spin state, and coherent driving with microwave excitation is also viable. Our results establish a scalable qubit in a two-dimensional material with spin-photon interface at the telecom wavelength region.

Identifiers

PMID35260586
PMCPMC8904548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.