Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35260581›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Cas9 exo-endonuclease eliminates chromosomal translocations during genome editing.

Jianhang Yin, Rusen Lu, Changchang Xin, Yuhong Wang, Xinyu Ling, Dong Li, Weiwei Zhang, Mengzhu Liu, Wutao Xie, Lingyun Kong and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CRISPR Technology and Its Emerging Applications.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Recent advances in therapeutic gene-editing technologies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianhang Yin *The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Rusen Lu *The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Changchang Xin *The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Yuhong WangThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Xinyu LingState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.
Dong LiThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Weiwei ZhangThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Mengzhu LiuThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Wutao XieThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Lingyun KongThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Wen SiThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Ping WeiThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Bingbing XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, China.
Hsiang-Ying LeeThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1503-5818
Tao LiuState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-5892
Jiazhi HuThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China. hujz@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-0039
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanism underlying unwanted structural variations induced by CRISPR-Cas9 remains poorly understood, and no effective strategy is available to inhibit the generation of these byproducts. Here we find that the generation of a high level of translocations is dependent on repeated cleavage at the Cas9-targeting sites. Therefore, we employ a strategy in which Cas9 is fused with optimized TREX2 to generate Cas9TX, a Cas9 exo-endonuclease, which prevents perfect DNA repair and thereby avoids repeated cleavage. In comparison with CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cas9TX greatly suppressed translocation levels and enhanced the editing efficiency of single-site editing. The number of large deletions associated with Cas9TX was also reduced to very low level. The application of CRISPR-Cas9TX for multiplex gene editing in chimeric antigen receptor T cells nearly eliminated deleterious chromosomal translocations. We report the mechanism underlying translocations induced by Cas9, and propose a general strategy for reducing chromosomal abnormalities induced by CRISPR-RNA-guided endonucleases.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9Gene EditingCRISPR-Cas SystemsEndonucleasesHumansRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTranslocation, GeneticCRISPR-Associated Protein 9EndonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID35260581
PMCPMC8904484
OpenAlexW4220793272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.